THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA, SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND, JJ.
Fatima Bibi @ Fatema Khatun, D/o. Sakir Hossen @ Saker Uddin Mia, W/o. Nazrul Hoque – Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India, Rep. By The Ministry Of Home Deptt. and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.483 of 2017
Decided On : 07-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims indian citizenship. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. evidence provided by petitioner lacking validation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. burden of proof lies with the petitioner. (Para 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24) |
| 4. failure to establish lineage linked to citizenship. (Para 23 , 25) |
| 5. writ petition dismissed, upholding tribunal's decision. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
JUDGMENT :
S.P. Khaund, J.
Heard Ms. S. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. A. Gayan, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, learned standing counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. A. I. Ali, learned standing counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarma, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State.
2. The petitioner Fatima Bibi is aggrieved by the impugned opinion dated 30.09.2016 in F.T. Case No. FT-9/79/GKJ/2015 and Ref. Case No. IM (D) T case no. 3012/98 passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal No. 9, Dhubri, whereby the petitioner was declared to be a foreigner who had entered into India from the specified territory on or after 25.03.1971. The instant case was registered and notices were issued to the petitioner. Earlier this case was registered under the IMDT Act, but was subsequently transferred to the Foreigners Tribunal. The petitioner appeared before the Tribunal and filed her written statement and duly contested the proceeding. She adduced her evidence as DW1 and the evidence of Moinul Hoque as DW2, and exhibited some documents.
2. Through her written statement, Fatima Bibi submitted that she is an Indian citizen and the letter ‘D’ was erroneously inserted against her name in the electoral roll. She tried to establish her lineage with her parents through the certificate issued by the Secretary of the Sagolia Gaon Panchayat and countersigned by the B.D.O of Agomani Development Block.
3. The petitioner further stated through her written statement that she was born and brought up in the village Chagalia Part-II and she studied upto Class- IX in Chagalia High School, P.O. Chhagalia, dist- Dhubri. The Headmaster had issued a transfer certificate dated 17.04.2006, and this certificate was countersigned by D.D.C. Dhubri. She further tried to establish her lineage with her father, through the Kabin Nama, stating that her marriage was solemnized with Nazrul Hoque, son of Late Jaher Mondal, a resident of village Maisha Pt-I, PO-Belguri, district Dhubri. The Kabin Nama was issued by Amir-E-Shorit and General Secretary, district-Dhubri Emarat-E-Sorit & Nodwatur- Tamir Sl No.148 dated 05.11.1989.
4. According to the petitioner, her grandfather's name was enrolled in the electoral roll of 1966-1971 under 35 Golakganj L.A.C. of village Sagolia Part- II as Sahar Uddin @ Sahir Uddin.
5. The petitioner stated through her written statement that her father's name, mother's name, brother's names, and sister-in-law's names were included in the voters list of 1997 as
Sakir Hossen @Sakir Hussain :- Father
Fojiran Bibi :- Mother
Foizul Hoque :- Brother
Moinul Hoque :- Brother
Morjina Bibi :- Sister-in-law
under 25 Golakganj L.A.C. of village Sagolia Part-II in the District- Dhubri Assam.
6. The petitioner through her written statement also brought on record that her father Sakir Hossen @ Sakir Hussain purchased a plot of land on 04.01.1994 vide Registered Sale Deed No.17 at Sagolia Pt-II, under Agomani Revenue Circle of Dhubri District. This written statement of the petitioner was substantiated by her evidence-in-chief. The petitioner reiterated the contents of the written statement through her evidence-in-chief. She marked the following documents as Exhibits and annexed some documents along with the written statement and evidence-in-chief, as described below:-
Exhibit- 1, school certificate,
Exhibit-2,Kabin Nama,
Exhibit-3,Registered sale Deed No. 17 dated 04.01.1994,
Annexure-A, photocopy of Voters list of 1997,
Annexure- B,Voters list of 2016,
Annexure-C,Voters details of 1966, Vide Legacy data No.340-4031-0264,
Exhibit-D, Vote
Claimants asserting citizenship must substantiate their claims with credible evidence, failing which their claims may be dismissed as seen in foreigner cases.
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
The burden of proof on individuals asserting citizenship under Section 9 of the Foreigners' Act, 1946, and the need for documentary evidence and verification of contents to establish citizenship.
The burden of proof to establish citizenship lies on the person asserting it, requiring credible evidence of lineage and personal knowledge.
Merely because documents were collected by petitioner during pendency of reference, it cannot be a ground to ignore same as documents have to be examined as regards the genuineness, authenticity, rel....
Citizenship requires establishing a direct, consistent bloodline linkage to an ancestor present before the specified cut-off date. Documentary evidence, such as voters' lists and residential certific....
The burden of proving citizenship rests entirely on the proceedee. Identification documents like voter cards or certificates do not constitute conclusive proof of citizenship, and appellate courts wi....
The burden of proof for establishing citizenship lies on the individual, necessitating credible and coherent evidence, which must be reliable and consistent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.