Individuals reporting for duty, but not assigned tasks, cannot be denied salary, affirming that appointment dates should effectively relate to the dates juniors were appointed.

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.

1. Heard Mr R.P. Sarmah, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms M. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dhar, learned Addl. Sr. Government Advocate appearing for the respondents/department.

2. The facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are that the Social & Welfare department, Government of Assam, had floated an advertisement for the post of LDA-cum-Typist. Although a select list was prepared pursuant to the selection process, and the petitioner had been placed at Sl. No. 23 position 18 of the select list, persons below the petitioner in the select list had been appointed. The petitioner had approached this Court by filing W.P(C) No. 5682/2001. By the order dated 29.05.2003, this Court had held that the only conceivable way in which the wrong done to the petitioner can be remedied was by issuing an appropriate direction to forthwith appoint the petitioner in the post of LDA in the office of the Child Development Project Officer (CDPO), ICDS Project, Juria, Nagaon. This Court was also of the view that if it was possible to accommodate the appointment of the petitioner against a vacant post, then the person who had been placed lower in the select list but came to be appointed need not be disturbed. Any disturbance in the service of such a person placed lower would arise only to accommodate the petitioner.

3. By the order dated 28.08.2003, the Director of Social Welfare had terminated the service of one of the persons who was situated lower in merit to accommodate the petitioner herein in the office of the Child Development Project Officer, Binakandi ICDS Nagaon. It is the case of the petitioner that by the joining report dated 01.09.2003, the petitioner had joined before the CDPO, Binakandi ICDS Project, Nagaon.

4. A review petition was then filed by one of the persons who had been dislodged from service to accommodate the petitioner. Notice in Review Petition No. 88/2003 was issued on 11.09.2003 with an observation that the operation of the impugned judgment & order dated 29.05.2003 would remain suspended. It was also directed that any order passed by the authority on 28.08.2003 in furtherance of the directions of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 5682/2001 would remain suspended, if the same had not been implemented in the meantime. Taking a cue from the order passed in the review petition, the Director of Social Welfare, Assam, had passed an order dated 14.10.2003, directing the CDPO, ICDS Project Binakandi, along with the CDPO, ICDS Project Barhampur, to maintain the status quo by allowing the two persons lower in merit appointed before the petitioner to continue in service. By a communication dated 27.10.2003, the Divisional Programme Officer (DPO), ICDS Nagaon, informed the Director that the petitioner and another person had already joined the office of the concerned ICDS Projects. However, due to the public disturbance, they were not attending their Project Office but were present in the office of the Divisional Programme Officer, ICDS at Nagaon without being allowed to sign the attendance register.

5. By the order dated 01.02.2005, this Court had dismissed Review Petition No. 88/2003, and by a specific order passed in WP(C) No. 552/2004, which was preferred by the present petitioner, the order dated 14.10.2003 passed by the Director of Social Welfare was set aside and quashed. Such being the position, the writ petitioner herein, on the dismissal of the review petition and in compliance with the order dated 01.02.2005 passed in WP(C) No. 558/2004, was again issued an appointment letter by the Director of Social Welfare Assam requiring him to join in the office of the Lakhipur ICDS Project, District-Goalpara on a certain scale of pay. The petitioner is now before this Court seeking the effect of his appointment from 01.09.2003.

6. On 22.08.2022, the petitioner made a representation to the Director, Woman and Child Development, Assam, praying that the petitioner ought to have b