IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Thejao Sekhose, S/o. Late Keduokietuo Sekhose – Appellant
Versus
Union of india, Represented by the secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition and unauthorized use. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 11) |
| 2. assessment and verification of damages. (Para 12 , 13 , 17) |
| 3. compensation claims and discrimination. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. disputed facts and alternative remedies. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 5. independence of epc contractor and liability. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 26) |
| 6. evidence basis for damage assessments. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 7. right to compensation for property damage. (Para 35 , 39 , 54 , 55) |
| 8. indemnity clauses in construction contracts. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT :
MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA, J.
1. Heard Mr. T. Khezhie, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Imti Imsong, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland appearing for the respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6.
2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sri Thejao Sekhose praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus/certiorari against the respondents.
3. The writ petitioner is a permanent resident of Kenuozou Colony, North Block, Kohima village and presently residing at Tsuru Colony of Secu
Smt. Gunwant Kaur and Ors. Vs. Municipal Committee Bhatinda and Ors.
Tukaram Kana Joshi and Others Vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Others
Chairman Grid Corporation of Orissa Limited (GRIDCO) and Ors. Vs. Smt. Sukamani Das and Anr.
Sushilaben Indravadan Gandhi and Anr. Vs. The New India Assurance Company Limited
Rights of property must be compensated when construction causes damage beyond the right of way, violating Articles 14, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.
Court directed an assessment and compensation for damages to local tribes' plantations due to highway construction, emphasizing timely relief and responsibility of authorities.
Contract and Specific Relief – Jurisdiction - There is no cause of action and matter may be appropriately referred to appropriate forum as there is arbitral agreement between parties to address all i....
The court clarified that ownership disputes regarding land acquisition must be resolved by the competent revenue authority, not through a writ petition under Article 226.
The National Highway Authority is jointly liable for environmental violations committed by its subcontractors, necessitating compliance with environmental laws and imposition of compensation for dama....
Partial land acquisition's severance or injurious affection requires objective evidence like maps, valuations, site plans; writ court dismisses without proof if arguments deviate from pleadings; libe....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.