THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KALYAN RAI SURANA
Jenny Ndang – Appellant
Versus
Speaker, Nagaland Legislative Assembly Secretariat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. historical context of promotion dispute and previous litigation. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. petitioner asserts seniority and mandatory dpc process. (Para 7 , 13) |
| 3. respondents argue secretary appointment is a selection post not requiring dpc. (Para 14 , 17 , 18 , 25) |
| 4. court’s evaluation of historical cadre rules and service history. (Para 26 , 31) |
| 5. secretary post is a selection post, excluding dpc procedures. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 6. dismissal of writ petition due to lack of merit. (Para 34 , 37) |
JUDGMENT :
KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.
Heard Mr. C.T. Jamir, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. I. Imchen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 as well as Mr. Taka Masa, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Sentilong, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.
Nature of challenge and prayers in this writ petition:
2) By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has assailed the notification dated 25.03.2026 issued by the Joint Secretary, Nagaland Legislative Assembly Secretariat, by which the Governor of Nagaland was pleased to promote Smt. Khruohituonuo R

Punjab State Power Corporation Limited & Anr. v. Bal Krishan Sharma & Ors.
Sanjay K. Sinha-II & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. J.R. William Singh
Ravindra Kumar Shrivastava v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Rama Negi v. Union of India & Ors.
Employees’ State Insurance Corporation v. Union of India & Ors.
Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab
Where specific service rules vest the power of appointment to a high-ranking administrative post in executive authorities, such provisions are exhaustive. General committee-based promotion procedures....
The court affirmed the principle of seniority in temporary appointments under the relevant service rules, emphasizing the need for adherence to established procedures.
Promotion decisions must consider overall service record and misconduct penalties; seniority alone does not guarantee promotion.
The court established that the promotion process must strictly adhere to the applicable recruitment rules and reservation policies, and that the status of posts as reserved or un-reserved can be dete....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the recommendation and promotion of the respondent No.4 to the post of DLR&SO were in accordance with the Post Based Roster and the reservatio....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.