THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Nelson Sailo, J.
Shri Nakap Hina Nabam, S/o - Tarum Hina Nabam - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh, Represented by the Chief Secretary - Respondents
WP(C) 341 of 2023
Decided On : 31-03-2026
JUDGMENT :
NELSON SAILO, J.
Heard Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh, for the State respondents; Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5.
[2.] By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for setting aside and quashing the Meeting Minutes of the Review Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 37) also the Meeting Minutes of the DPC dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 33), Officiating appointment of the respondent No. 4 vide Order dated 11.06.2003 (Annexure – 2), Officiating appointment Order of the respondent No. 5 vide Order dated 27.02.2004 (Annexure – 3) and the Order dated 19.01.2005 (Annexure – 5) by which the Officiating Appointment of the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 have been regularized from the date of sitting of the DPC i.e. 19.01.2005 (F/N). The petitioner has also sought for a direction for giving effect to the Minutes of the DPC dated 18.10.2022 (Annexure – 29), by which he and the respondent No. 4 have been found fit to be promoted to the two (2) vacant posts of District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer (DLR&SO). Pending disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner has sought for an interim order for staying/suspension of the DPC Minutes both dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 37). This Court, while issuing notice of motion on 26.07.2023, had passed an interim order staying the DPC Minutes both dated 23.06.2023 and the interim order continues as on today.
[3.] The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was appointed to the post of Supervisor Kanungo (hereafter referred as SK for short) in the Department of Land Management vide Order dated 24.08.2009 (Annexure – 10), pursuant to the recommendation made by the Constituted Board. The petitioner, after being appointed as such, was sent for Special Class Course Training at Assam Survey & Settlement Training Centre, Dakhingaon, Guwahati and successfully completed the training and his name appeared at Serial No. 29 of the Notification dated 02.06.2011 (Annexure – 11) by which the names of the successful trainees were notified.
[4.] The petitioner after serving about six (6) years as SK, was promoted to the post of Assistant Survey and Settlement Officer (AS&SO) on Officiating basis against the vacancy caused on account of superannuation of the incumbent concerned on the basis of the representation submitted by him to the Director of Land Management, Government of Arunachal Pradesh on 21.01.2016. The Officiating promotion was issued vide Order dated 02.02.2016 (Annexure – 20). Subsequently, the constituted DPC, which sat on 29.12.2016, found the petitioner fit for promotion and regularized his service from the date of his Officiating appointment. Accordingly, vide Order dated 29.12.2016 (Annexure – 23), the petitioner was given the promotion to the post of AS&SO w.e.f. 02.02.2016. Be stated herein that the post of Plane Tabler (PT) was re- designated as AS&SO vide Order dated 19.12.2014, which was published in the Arunachal Pradesh Gazette Notification dated 19.01.2015 (Annexure – 16).
[5.] The next promotional post from the post of AS&SO is to the post of District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer (DLR&SO) in terms of the Land Revenue and Settlement Officer, Group ‘B’ (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 2006 (Rules of 2006) and its amendment i.e., the District Land Revenue Settlement Officer Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 2015 (Amendment Rules of 2015). As per the Amendment Rules of 2015, the post of DLR&SO may be filled up by promotion from Assistant Settlement & Survey Officer (AS&SO) having five (5) years of regular service in the grade, or from Surveyor who has rendered eleven (11) years of service in the grade, or from Recorder Kanungo/SK who has rendered fifteen (15) years of service in the grade, possessing the educational qualification of Graduation or a Bachelor’s degree in an

Uma Rani Vs. Registrar Cooperative Society
Nagendra Chandra Vs. State of Jharkhand
State of Bihar Vs. Upendra Narayan Singh
State of Orissa Vs. Mamta Mohanty
The State of Jammu & Kashmir Vs. District Bar Association
Madhya Pradesh Vs. Lalit Kumar Verma
National Fertilizer Limited Vs. Somvir Singh
Post Master General, Kolkata Vs. Tutu Das (Dutta)
Dhiresh Ch. Paul Vs. Tripura Khadi & Village Industries Board
Hemanta Changmai Vs. State of Assam
Ajay Kumar Das Vs. State of Orissa
Jaiveer Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Suraj Parkash Gupta & Ors. Vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors.
State of Orissa & Ors. Vs. Sukanti Mohapatra & Ors.
Arun Kumar Chatterjee Vs. South Eastern Railway & Ors.
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Rafiquddin & Ors.
Vijay Kumar Kaul & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Ajit Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Ors.
Shankara Cooperative Housing Society Limited Vs. M. Prabhakar & Ors.
Pramod Kumar Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission & Ors.
An illegitimate promotion violating recruitment rules and seniority is void ab initio and curable via review. Challenges to long-settled appointments are unsustainable under the principles of delay a....
The right to promotion constitutes a fundamental right under Article 16, and arbitrary actions by regulatory bodies that deny such rights are unlawful.
The court established that the promotion process must strictly adhere to the applicable recruitment rules and reservation policies, and that the status of posts as reserved or un-reserved can be dete....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the recommendation and promotion of the respondent No.4 to the post of DLR&SO were in accordance with the Post Based Roster and the reservatio....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the compliance with the Division Bench's directions and the applicable provisions of law in rejecting the petitioner's claim.
Appointing authority cannot selectively reject DPC recommendations for eligible candidate while accepting for others without following Handbook procedure for disagreement; must ensure equal treatment....
Where specific service rules vest the power of appointment to a high-ranking administrative post in executive authorities, such provisions are exhaustive. General committee-based promotion procedures....
Promotion decisions must consider overall service record and misconduct penalties; seniority alone does not guarantee promotion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.