SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 1046

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Nelson Sailo, J.
Shri Nakap Hina Nabam, S/o - Tarum Hina Nabam - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Arunachal Pradesh, Represented by the Chief Secretary - Respondents
WP(C) 341 of 2023
Decided On : 31-03-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. T. Tagum, Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr. N. Ratan, Addl. A.G., AP, Mr. T. T. Tara, Adv., Mr. L. Perme, Adv.

An illegitimate promotion violating recruitment rules and seniority is void ab initio and curable via review. Challenges to long-settled appointments are unsustainable under the principles of delay and laches, which prioritize administrative stability and the finality of service records over stale grievances.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 14 and 309 - Public employment - Promotion - Illegality - Selection process conducted in defiance of established seniority and recruitment norms is void ab initio and cannot be validated through post-facto regularization - Administrative authorities possess inherent jurisdiction to rectify patent errors in prior selections by convening review committees. (Paras 34, 37)

(B) Service Law - Appointment - Delay and laches - Challenge to long-standing incumbents - Once seniority positions have remained unchallenged for several years, judicial interference to unsettle such status is impermissible on account of delay - Rights of parties cannot be disturbed when such challenges are instituted with excessive lethargy. (Paras 16, 36)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner challenged the findings of a review committee that recommended withdrawing his promotion to a higher grade, arguing the primary selection was improper for failing to consider senior candidates. Additionally, the petitioner sought to invalidate the regularized appointments of other employees who had been in service for nearly two decades.

Findings of Court:
The review committee’s determination was found to be legally sound as the initial promotion lacked compliance with requisite seniority and qualification standards. The challenge against the longstanding tenure of other employees was dismissed owing to the principle of delay and laches.

Issues: The primary issues were whether an administrative body has the power to rectify a flawed promotion process through a review committee and whether a petitioner can challenge the seniority and appointments of others after a significant lapse of time.

Ratio Decidendi: A promotion granted in violation of mandatory recruitment rules and ignoring senior eligible candidates is non est in the eye of law, precluding any protection under principles of equity; administrative bodies are obligated to correct such errors, and courts shall not permit the reopening of settled service issues after prolonged inactivity from the aggrieved party.

Result: Petition disposed of; promotion stands withdrawn; directive issued for conduction of a fresh selection process.

JUDGMENT :

NELSON SAILO, J.

Heard Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Ratan, learned Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh, for the State respondents; Mr. T. T. Tara, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 and Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5.

[2.] By filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for setting aside and quashing the Meeting Minutes of the Review Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 37) also the Meeting Minutes of the DPC dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 33), Officiating appointment of the respondent No. 4 vide Order dated 11.06.2003 (Annexure – 2), Officiating appointment Order of the respondent No. 5 vide Order dated 27.02.2004 (Annexure – 3) and the Order dated 19.01.2005 (Annexure – 5) by which the Officiating Appointment of the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 have been regularized from the date of sitting of the DPC i.e. 19.01.2005 (F/N). The petitioner has also sought for a direction for giving effect to the Minutes of the DPC dated 18.10.2022 (Annexure – 29), by which he and the respondent No. 4 have been found fit to be promoted to the two (2) vacant posts of District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer (DLR&SO). Pending disposal of the writ petition, the petitioner has sought for an interim order for staying/suspension of the DPC Minutes both dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure – 37). This Court, while issuing notice of motion on 26.07.2023, had passed an interim order staying the DPC Minutes both dated 23.06.2023 and the interim order continues as on today.

[3.] The case of the petitioner in brief is that he was appointed to the post of Supervisor Kanungo (hereafter referred as SK for short) in the Department of Land Management vide Order dated 24.08.2009 (Annexure – 10), pursuant to the recommendation made by the Constituted Board. The petitioner, after being appointed as such, was sent for Special Class Course Training at Assam Survey & Settlement Training Centre, Dakhingaon, Guwahati and successfully completed the training and his name appeared at Serial No. 29 of the Notification dated 02.06.2011 (Annexure – 11) by which the names of the successful trainees were notified.

[4.] The petitioner after serving about six (6) years as SK, was promoted to the post of Assistant Survey and Settlement Officer (AS&SO) on Officiating basis against the vacancy caused on account of superannuation of the incumbent concerned on the basis of the representation submitted by him to the Director of Land Management, Government of Arunachal Pradesh on 21.01.2016. The Officiating promotion was issued vide Order dated 02.02.2016 (Annexure – 20). Subsequently, the constituted DPC, which sat on 29.12.2016, found the petitioner fit for promotion and regularized his service from the date of his Officiating appointment. Accordingly, vide Order dated 29.12.2016 (Annexure – 23), the petitioner was given the promotion to the post of AS&SO w.e.f. 02.02.2016. Be stated herein that the post of Plane Tabler (PT) was re- designated as AS&SO vide Order dated 19.12.2014, which was published in the Arunachal Pradesh Gazette Notification dated 19.01.2015 (Annexure – 16).

[5.] The next promotional post from the post of AS&SO is to the post of District Land Revenue and Settlement Officer (DLR&SO) in terms of the Land Revenue and Settlement Officer, Group ‘B’ (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 2006 (Rules of 2006) and its amendment i.e., the District Land Revenue Settlement Officer Recruitment (Amendment) Rules, 2015 (Amendment Rules of 2015). As per the Amendment Rules of 2015, the post of DLR&SO may be filled up by promotion from Assistant Settlement & Survey Officer (AS&SO) having five (5) years of regular service in the grade, or from Surveyor who has rendered eleven (11) years of service in the grade, or from Recorder Kanungo/SK who has rendered fifteen (15) years of service in the grade, possessing the educational qualification of Graduation or a Bachelor’s degree in an









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top