SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 699

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT, (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.
Rahul Das – Petitioner 
Versus
The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., rep. By Its Chairman and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) No.1373 of 2022
Decided On : 07-05-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. J. Patowary.
For the Respondents: Mr. N. Deka, Mr R. Karim, Mr. B Phukan, Mr A.R. Barooah, Mr. M. Gogoi.

Candidates are entitled to cumulative age relaxation benefits for both reserved category status and apprenticeship training if the recruitment advertisement provides for such relaxations, ensuring fair opportunity and preventing erroneous rejection of eligible applicants.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment - Age relaxation - Cumulative benefit - Whether a candidate is entitled to age relaxation for both reserved category status and apprenticeship training - Held, yes, if the advertisement provides for such relaxations, they must be applied cumulatively to ensure fair opportunity. (Paras 14, 15, 25)

(B) Recruitment process - Discrepancies and irregularities - Admission by employer regarding erroneous rejection of candidature - Effect - Employer directed to reconsider the candidate for the selection process after granting the due age relaxation. (Paras 20, 25, 30)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner applied for a technical position. The employer rejected the application on the ground that the candidate exceeded the maximum age limit, even after accounting for the relaxation provided to reserved category candidates. The petitioner contended that he was also entitled to an additional age relaxation for having completed apprenticeship training, as stipulated in the recruitment advertisement.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the employer had erroneously denied the petitioner the benefit of cumulative age relaxation. The employer admitted to discrepancies in the recruitment process and acknowledged that the petitioner was entitled to the additional relaxation. Consequently, the court directed the employer to allow the petitioner to participate in the remaining stages of the selection process.

Issues: The main issues were whether the candidate was entitled to cumulative age relaxation for both reserved category status and apprenticeship training, and whether the rejection of the candidature was based on an erroneous interpretation of the recruitment advertisement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that where an advertisement provides for multiple distinct grounds for age relaxation, these benefits should be applied cumulatively to eligible candidates. The admission of procedural irregularities by the employer further necessitated the reconsideration of the petitioner's candidature.

Result: Writ petition disposed of with directions to the employer to consider the petitioner's candidature.

Table of Content
1. establishing employment eligibility criteria and recruitment procedural history. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 13)
2. petitioner's right to cumulative age relaxation based on apprenticeship and reserved category status. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. respondent's admissions of procedural error and arguments against additional relaxation. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. harmonious construction of recruitment clauses and binding effect of precedent on age relaxation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
5. mandate to rectify selection process and proceed based on merit with appropriate relaxations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH MAZUMDAR, J.

Heard Mr. J. Patowary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. I. Choudhury, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. T. Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the IOCL and Mr. B. Phukan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 5.

2. The petitioner in this writ petition is a graduate from Gauhati University, having obtained his degree of Bachelor of Science with a major in Physics in the year 2014. The petitioner also belongs to the class of candidates identified as Other Backward Classes. The writ petition contains a format of certificate supplied by the respondent IOCL to the candidates where the petitioner has been certified to belong to the Backward Class under the relevant notifications of the Government of India, and it has also been certified that he does not belong to the persons or sections included in the creamy layer mentioned in the relevant schedule to the Government of India, DOPT OM dated 08.09.1993. The aforesaid format had been issued by the competent authority on the basis of a certificate which was earlier issued to the petitioner. The petitioner, after having attained his educational qualifications, had undergone a training course. On successful completion of the training, he was awarded a “National Apprenticeship Certificate” issued by the Directorate General of Training, Government of India, certifying that the petitioner had undergone appropriate training from 12.05.2017 to 11.05.2019 in the designated trade of Boiler Attendant. Another certificate had been issued to the petitioner by the Indian Oil Corporation Limited certifying that the petitioner had completed the 24 months Apprenticeship Training as a Trade Apprentice (Boiler Attendant) under the Apprenticeship Act.

3. The Indian Oil Corporation Limited had floated an advertisement on 25.09.2021 calling for applications, amongst others, for the post of Junior Engineering Assistant - IV (Power and Utility), post code 202. The number of posts shown to be available in IOCL, Guwahati, was 3, out of which two would be available for candidates belonging to the unreserved category, whereas one post was shown to be reserved for candidates belonging to the OBC (Non- Creamy Layer) category. The qualification and experience criteria, given at clause B of the aforesaid advertisement with regard to the post of Junior Engineering Assistant - IV (P & U), required the candidate to possess a three- year's diploma in mechanical or electrical engineering from a recognized institute of the University and Boiler Competency Certificate, with a proviso that in case of non-availability of sufficient number of candidates meeting the prescribed parameters, candidates possessing other qualifications noted in the advertisement itself, including BSc (PCM) with apprenticeship training in boiler trade would also be considered for the said post.

4. Insofar as the criteria of experience for the aforesaid post are concerned, the advertisement noted that, for candidates possessing Diploma/Metric with ITI (Fitter) and holding a Boiler Competency Certificate or a BSc with boiler apprenticeship, no further experience would be required. The requirements for candidates possessing a diploma were also laid down in the advertisement itself. However, since the same does not concern th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top