THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Kalyan Rai Surana, Shamima Jahan, JJ.
Shajiran @ Saziran Bewa, W/O. A. Rashid – Petitioner
Versus
The Union Of India Rep. By The Secretary To The Govt. Of India, Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi And Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) 6343 of 2019
Decided On : 21-05-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural context and competing contentions regarding citizenship and linkage evidence. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. failure to disclose material facts and inconsistencies in oral evidence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 3. mandatory burden of proving citizenship through admissible, corroborated documentary evidence. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 4. dismissal of petition due to absence of proof of linkage and lack of jurisdictional error. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT :
K.R. Surana, J.
Heard Mr. A.A. Dewan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Gogoi, learned CGC for respondent no.1; Ms. A. Verma, learned standing counsel for FT and Border matters for respondent nos. 2, 4 and 6; Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Addl. Senior Govt. Advocate for respondent no.3; and Mr. A.I. Ali, learned standing counsel for Election Commission of India for respondent no.5.
2) By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, namely, Shajiran @ Saziran Bewa, has assailed the opinion dated 26.06.2018, passed by the learned Member, Foreigners Tribunal-5 , Barpeta, Assam, in Case No. F.T.(5 ) 42/2016, arising out of Reference IM(D)T Case No. 4287(A)/97, by which she was declared to be a foreigner who had entered Assam on or after 25.03.1971.
3) The learned counsel for the petitioner, by referring to the written statement filed by the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner had denied the allegation that she was a foreigner and took all the defence relevant to establish that she was not a foreigner.
4) Moreover, it was submitted that the petitioner had examined herself as DW-1, and in her evidence-on-affidavit the petitioner had reiterated the statements made in her written statement. It was submitted that the petitioner had stated that she is a citizen of India, and born and brought up at village- Balagaon, under Mouza- Titapani, under P.S. Baghbar, in the then district of Kamrup. Her father’s name is Nabur Uddin Sheikh and her mother’s name is Mahiran Nessa and their names appear in the electoral roll of 1966 and 1970 of village- Balagaon, 51 No. Jania LAC. She was married to Abdul Rasid, son of Late Abdul Hamid of village- Khelli, Mouza- Titapani, under P.S. Baghbar, in the district of Barpeta, Assam and her name appeared for the first time along with her husband in the electoral roll of 1985 of village- Khelli under 44 No. Jania LAC. After 1985, she had shifted to village- Balagaon, under Mouza- Titapani, under P.S. Baghbar (presently Kalgachia), in the district of Barpeta and her name appeared in the electoral roll of 1989 with her husband at village- Balagaon, under 44 No. Jania LAC. Her name also appeared in the electoral roll of 1997 at village- Balagaon, under 44 No. Jania LAC, but marked as ‘D’. A link certificate has been issued in her favour by the Secretary of the Tapeswara Gaon Panchayat in respect of her marriage, which is countersigned by the B.D.O. of Rupshi Development Block and the Gaonburah of village Balagaon and Khelli had issued two separate certificates in respect of her residential identity and marriage linkage. She had stated that her actual name is Shaziran Nessa, which is correctly recorded in all voters’ lists, but in the case record, her name is wrongly written as Shaziran Bewa and that both the names are of one person, i.e. petitioner. In support of her contention, she had exhibited the following documents:-
i. Certified copy of voter list of 1966 (Ext.A)
ii. Certified copy of voter list of 1970 (Ext.B)
iii. Certified copy of voter list of 1985 (Ext.C)
iv. Certified copy of voter list of 1989 (Ext.D)
v. Certificate by Gaonburah of Balagaon (Ext.E)
vi. Certificate by Gaonburah of Khelli (Ext.F).
5) It was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in support of her defence, the petitioner had also examined Abdus Samad Ahmed, the Gaonburah of village- Balagaon as DW-2; and Hajarat Ali, he
AI
The burden of proof lies on the petitioner to establish citizenship, which was not met due to insufficient evidence linking her to her claimed lineage.
The court upheld the Tribunal's decision declaring the petitioner a foreigner due to insufficient evidence of citizenship, emphasizing the importance of credible documentation.
The burden of proof lies with the petitioner to establish citizenship through credible evidence, and discrepancies in documentation can lead to a declaration of foreign nationality.
Merely because documents were collected by petitioner during pendency of reference, it cannot be a ground to ignore same as documents have to be examined as regards the genuineness, authenticity, rel....
The burden lies on the petitioner to provide reliable evidence establishing citizenship, which was not met, leading to the declaration of foreign status.
Citizenship requires establishing a direct, consistent bloodline linkage to an ancestor present before the specified cut-off date. Documentary evidence, such as voters' lists and residential certific....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.