Back
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
N.UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Jogen Loing S/o Late Kalua Loing – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the recruitment and pay disparity claim. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contentions regarding equal pay and the validity of qualification-based classification. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. qualification-based pay differentiation is constitutional and permissible. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed, confirming validity of government pay structures. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT :
N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR, J.
1. Heard Mr. R. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Addl. AG, Assam along with Mr. M. Bhuyan, learned standing counsel, Health & Family Welfare (H&FW) Department, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 & 5, Mr. R.K. Talukdar, learned standing counsel, AG(A&E) Assam and Mr. A. Bhattacharyya, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 6.
2. The petitioners in the present writ petition have prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities for enhancement of their grade pay to Rs. 3300/- (Three Thousand Three Hundred) by maintaining parity with the grade pay authorized to the respondent No. 6, who is also working in a post similar to one held by the petitioners, herein, in Jorhat
The principle of equal pay for equal work does not entitle employees to claim parity in pay scales if their recruitment processes differ significantly.
The court established that the principle of equal pay for equal work does not apply rigidly when different qualifications and job responsibilities exist, and that the government has the discretion to....
The court ruled that the higher pay scale granted to respondent No.4 was illegal and emphasized adherence to recruitment rules, ensuring equal treatment for similarly situated employees.
The determination of pay scales is the exclusive domain of the state, and courts should only intervene in cases of constitutional violations.
The court emphasized the importance of maintaining equivalency and analogousness in pay scales for similar positions as per the decision of the Executive Council.
Pay scales and post classification are executive's exclusive domain; courts refrain from equating posts absent grave error proof. Equal pay demands identical duties/responsibilities, not just qualifi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
