SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Gau) 829

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AT KOHIMA BENCH
KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.
Hukheto Yepthomi S/o Late Lhomithi Yepthomi – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland and Others – Respondents
WP (C) No. 23 of 2026
Decided On : 29-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Zhimomi
For the Respondents: V. Suokhrie, Limawapang

An authority vested with the power to make an appointment possesses the inherent administrative power to suspend, dismiss, or reshuffle such appointees, provided there are no express statutory prohibitions or contradictory rules governing the conduct of such administrative affairs.

Headnote:(A) Municipal Laws - Statutes, Rules, and Regulations - Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ jurisdiction - Administrative power of the Chairperson of a Municipal Body - Power to appoint members to committees includes the inherent power to remove or substitute such members - In the absence of specific provisions in the municipal legislation or rules prohibiting the reshuffling of committees, the authority who has the power to appoint possesses the power to modify or reshuffle those appointments. (Paras 21, 22, 23)

(B) Municipal Governance - Administrative Functions vs. Procedural Requirements - Conduct of Business - Requirements for meetings and agendas - The exercise of administrative powers, such as the reshuffling of committee portfolios, does not necessarily require the prior consensus of all municipal council members or strict adherence to procedures meant for formal municipal business, unless specifically mandated by statute. (Paras 26, 28, 35)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, the Chairperson of a municipal body, filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order issued by a government department. The impugned order declared the petitioner's decision to reshuffle sub-committees of the municipal body as null and void, citing procedural lapses and alleged non-compliance with the provisions of local municipal legislation regarding the conduct of business and the powers of the government to review proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court found that no specific provision in the applicable municipal legislation or government guidelines restricted the Chairperson from reshuffling committee members. It was observed that the initial constitution of these committees had been accepted, and under the principle of general interpretation of statutes, the power to appoint includes the power to suspend or dismiss. The reasons cited by the government for interference were deemed unsubstantiated and vague.

Issues: The main issues were: (1) whether the Chairperson possessed the authority to reshuffle members/convenors of sub-committees; (2) whether the order of reshuffling was invalid for lack of consultation or procedural non-compliance; and (3) whether the government's interference with such administrative action was legally sustainable.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that in the silence of specific statutory provisions governing the reshuffling of sub-committees, the Chairperson, having exercised the power to initially appoint members, retains the inherent administrative power to reshuffle them. Administrative actions that have not been shown to be in violation of any mandatory statutory provision cannot be nullified by the State on the premise of vague procedural lapses.

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside and the petitioner's decision restored.

Table of Content
1. factual background leading to the contested reshuffling of council sub-committees. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. parties argument on the chairperson's authority versus state administrative oversight. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. statutory framework governing municipal conduct of business and record production. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
4. power to appoint a committee includes inherent power to reshuffle members. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. lack of statutory mandate for prior consultation when reshuffling administrative committee portfolios. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
6. court holds state interference invalid, restoring the chairperson's original order. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)

JUDGMENT :

KALYAN RAI SURANA, J.

1. Heard Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. V. Suokhrie, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. Limawapang, learned counsel for respondent no. 4.

2. By filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is the Chairperson of the Dimapur Municipal Council, has assailed letter No. MA/DMC-01/2026/450 dated 23.01.2026, by which certain directions were issued by the Addl. Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland, Municipal Affairs Department (respondent no. 2).

3. In brief, the case of the petitioner is that pursuant to elections held for the Councillors of the Dimapur Municipal Council, the elected Councillors took oath of office on 05.07.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner was elected as the Chairperson of the Dimapur Municipal Council. In the absence of any rules, the Municipal Affairs Department issued a General Advisory/Guidelines for newly constituted Urban Local Bodies vide Memo No. MA-15/ 2024/553 dated 26.07.2024 (hereinafter referred to as “Guidelines dated 26.07.2024 for brevity), which, amongst others, envisaged setting up Committees with convenors, co-convenors and members. Accordingly, in terms of the said Guidelines dated 26.07.2024, the petitioner, as the Chairperson of the Dimapur Municipal Council, vide order dated 13.08.2024, constituted eleven Sub-Committees with convenors and members from among the elected Councillors of the Dimapur Municipal Council. Thereafter, another meeting of the Dimapur Municipal Council was held on 15.12.2025 in the Office Chamber of the Chairman. In the said meeting, the petitioner, in the presence of a few councillors, amongst others, informed that in the interest of the Dimapur Municipal Council and the general welfare of the office, especially considering the dire financial health of the Council, reshuffling of the Sub- Committees and In-Charges would be undertaken as agreed to by the members present. Consequently, by Order No. TMC/G-1(CP)/2024/2561- 562 dated 22.12.2025, the In-charge/Co-convenors/Members of the various Sub-Committees were reshuffled.

4. Without referring to the various communications, it would suffice to mention that the Addl. Secretary to the Govt. of Nagaland, Municipal Affairs Department (respondent no. 2), by the impugned Order No. MA/DMC-01/2026/450 dated 23.01.2026, observed that there were procedural lapses in the issuance of the order dated 22.12.2025 by the Chairperson of the Dimapur Municipal Council, as it did not adhere to the provisions of Chapter V (Conduct of Business) of the Nagaland Municipal Act, 2023, and that the order was also issued without following the procedure laid down under Section 77(2)(a) of the said Act. Accordingly, in exercise of power under Section 81 of the Nagaland Municipal Act, 2023, the following directives were issued:

1. That the Order issued vide No. DMC/G-1/CP/2024/561-562, dated Dimapur the 22nd December, 2025 shall be considered null & void.

2. The Chairperson shall call for a meeting afresh for a special discussion on Revenue Collections and Assignment of Committees to the elected councilors as per provisions of Chapter V Conduct of Busin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top