THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Manish Choudhury, J.
Biju Dey - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Assam, represented by Secretary to the Government of Assam, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department - Respondents
Writ petition [c] NO. 277/2026
Decided On : 27-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual history and sequence of license suspension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. interpretative limit on suspension period under apda order. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. operative order directing restoration of license. (Para 16) |
JUDGMENT :
Manish Choudhury, J.
Heard Mr. R. Phukan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. U. Das, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate for all the respondents.
2. The petitioner was granted a retailer licence bearing no. NSG 411 [R]/2012 on 15.10.2012 under the provisions of the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order, 1982, framed under Section 3 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. On the basis of the said licence, the petitioner was running a Fair Price Shop [FPS] at Village – Garubandha no. 2, Police Station – Kachua, Nagaon under the aegis of M/s Jarabari Samabai Sammittee Limited distributing Public Distribution System [PDS] articles to the ration card holders/beneficiaries, tagged to the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner.
3. Pursuant to a complaint received from one Sharmila Das alleging that the petitioner had lifted 41.95 quintals of rice on 22.01.2022 from the godown of M/s Jarabari Samabai Sammittee Limited and the same was sold in the open market by depriving the beneficiaries tagged with the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner, [i] an Inspector, Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, Nagaon; and [ii] the Secretary, M/s Jarabari Samabai Sammittee Limited, Kakoti Gaon made a visit to the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner for an inspection. During the inspection, the petitioner was asked to produce the Books of Accounts relating to lifting and distribution of controlled commodities including the licence, etc.
4. After the inspection carried out in the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner on 28.01.2022, a Seizure List dated 28.01.2022 and a Zimmanama of even date were prepared by the Seizing & Area Officer and the same was placed before the respondent no. 4. Finding violation of Clause nos. 14 & 18 of the APDA Order and various terms and conditions of the licence issued to the petitioner, the respondent no. 4 has placed the licence of the petitioner under suspension vide an Order dated 19.02.2022 exercising power under Clause 15 of the APDA Order. By the order, the ration card holders/beneficiaries tagged with the Fair Price Shop [FPS] of the petitioner were tagged with the nearest Fair Price Shop [FPS] in the greater interest of the beneficiaries.
5. Close on the heels of the Suspension Order, a Show Cause Notice was served upon to the petitioner alleging violation of Clause no. 6 [4][i] of the Public Distribution System [Control] Order 2001 by the respondent no. 4 on 25.05.2022 asking the petitioner to show cause as to why the case should not be sent to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagaon for trial. In the Show-Cause Notice, it was mentioned that the petitioner had allegedly violated the provisions of Clause no. 6 [4][i] of the Public Distribution System [Control] Order 2001. In the Show Cause Notice, though various provisions from the APDA Order were mentioned, the action proposed was not cancellation of the licence of the petitioner issued under the APDA Order, 1982. The Reply from the petitioner was asked for on the proposed action of sending the case to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagaon. In response to the Show Cause Notice, the petitioner submitted a Reply immediately thereafter.
6. But, despite submission of the Reply and finding the allegations made in the complaint to be prima facie correct, an Offence Report was prepared for alleged violations of Clause nos. 14 & 18 of the APDA Order and Term and Condition nos. 3 [a][b], 4, 6 & 8 of the Licence, read with Clause 6 [4][1] of the Public Distribution System [Control] Order, 2001 by the Seizing & Area Officer. Thereafter, the Offence Report was submitted before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate to initiate the proceedin
A suspended license under the Assam Public Distribution of Articles Order must have timely cancellation proceedings initiated within 90 days; otherwise, the suspension becomes invalid.
Conviction under Section 409, IPC influences the validity of a retail license under the APDA Order, necessitating the licensing authority's decision on license cancellation or renewal following due l....
Suspension of fair price shop license was arbitrary as it violated prescribed procedures, warranting judicial intervention despite alternative remedies.
Licensing Authority must provide specific reasons in cancellation orders; non-speaking orders violate principles of natural justice and are unsustainable in law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the licensee of a fair price shop is required to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions of the license and the provisions of the Control ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.