SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Ker) 768

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, K.HARILAL, ANTONY DOMINIC
P. K. Haneefa – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By Its Chief Secretary – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners:S.P. Aravindakshan Pillay, Mrs. Resmi G. Nair, S. Ramesh Babu, P. Ravindran, Sr. Advocates. Anil Sivaraman, Mrs. Anu Sivaraman, S.P. Aravindakshan Pillay, Mrs. N. Santha, V. Varghese, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R1, Sr. Govt Pleader, C.S. Manilal, R2, K.R.B. Kaimal (Sr.), R3, O.V. Radhakrishnan (Sr.) Advocate, Shiju Vargheese, Pramoj Abraham, R4 C. Khalid, N. Gopinatha Panicker, P. Viswambaran, R.O. Muhamed Shemeem, R6 & R10, M. Pathrose Matthai (Sr.), Saji Varghese, R7, V.B. Unniraj, Mrs. R.S. Geetha, Mrs. P. Anitha, R8, Grashious Kuriakose (Sr.) Advocate, R9, K.J. Kuriachan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

Antony Dominic, J.

1. Petitioners in these Original Petitions are officers in the cadre of District and Sessions Judges and the main question raised is whether the Kerala State Higher Judicial Service Special Rules (hereinafter referred to as `the Special Rules') provide any separate quota for direct recruitment from the Bar.

2. When these cases were heard, petitioners relied on a Division Bench judgment of this Court in O.P.No.1790 of 1985 and connected cases where it was held that the Special Rules did not provide any quota for direct recruitment but only provided the proportion to be maintained if appointment is made by direct recruitment. The learned judge considered the matter and in view of the Apex Court judgments in O. P. Singla Vs. Union of India (1984 (4)SCC 450), State of Kerala v. A. Lakshmikutty and Others (1986 (4) SCC 632) and P.S. Gopinathan Vs. State of Kerala (2008 (7) SCC 70), doubted the correctness of the Division Bench judgment. Accordingly, by order dated 2.8.2011, these cases were referred to a Division Bench. Thereupon, these cases were considered by a Division Bench, which also agreed with the view taken by the learned single Judge and by order



















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top