C.T.RAVIKUMAR, ANIL K.NARENDRAN
T. P. Kunhikoyamutty Secretary Puthan Peedika Palli Paripalana Committee – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Muhammed Kutty S/o. Assamutty Marakkar – Respondent
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.
1. This civil revision petition filed under the proviso to sub-section (9) of Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995 arises out of the judgment of the Waqf Tribunal, Kozhikode, dated 24.12.2011 in O.S.No.11/2011. The revision petitioners, namely, Puthan Peedika Palli Paripalana Committee, a Society Registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and its Secretary are the plaintiffs in the said suit filed before the Waqf Tribunal seeking a declaration that the 2nd plaintiff committee is the mutawalli of the plaint schedule properties covered by Ext.B1 waqf deed bearing No.192/1958 dated 3.2.1958 and the institutions situated therein; and a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the 1st defendant (1st respondent herein) from interfering with the administration of the waqf.
2. The plaintiffs' case in brief is as follows; The plaint schedule properties were dedicated by one Biriyankutty Umma, daughter of Chakkiri Moideen Kutty, as per Ext.B1 waqf deed. The waqif appointed one Assamukutty Marakkar (son-in-law of her son) as the mutawalli. Velunthamannil Parambil Palli is situated in plaint schedule item No.1. Plaint schedule item No.2 is a garden land, a
Abdul Latheef K.A. and others v. K.P. Abdurahiman and others
Badagara J.P.D. Committee v. Ummerkutty Haji
Maulvi Abdul Rahman Siyai v. Sardar Maqbool Hasan and others
Mohammed Sulaiman and another v. Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board and another
Puthiyapura Sheik Koya Thangal and another v. P.P. Koyammakoya and others
Sayed Muhammed Mashur Kunhi Koya Thangal v. Badagara Jumayath Palli Dharas Committee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.