A.HARIPRASAD, T.V.ANILKUMAR
G. Gopakumar S/o Govindapillai – Appellant
Versus
Ancy Thankachan Philip W/o Anson K. J. – Respondent
1. The cardinal question commonly arising in the captioned cases is whether the Appellate Authority, constituted under Section 18 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (in short, the Act) has power to condone delay in filing an appeal by invoking Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short, the Limitation Act). A similar doubt raised earlier had been dispelled when the Supreme Court pronounced a judgment in Mukri Gopalan vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker, AIR 1995 SC 2272. But, now it appears that the doubt has resurrected in the minds of some learned Judges who disposed of the appeals involved in these cases on the basis of a pronouncement by a Division Bench of this Court in Ratheesh vs. A.M. Chacko and Another, 2018 (5) KHC 35, which in turn relied on M.P. Steel Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, 2015 (7) SCC 58.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioners and contesting respondents.
3. We shall narrate the relevant facts in brief: R.C.R. No. 262 of 2019 is filed by the tenants/respondents in R.C.P. No. 8 of 2014 before the Rent Control Court, Adoor, who suffered an order of eviction under Section 11(3) of the Act. Th
Consolidated Engg. Enterprises vs. Irrigation Deptt. (2008) 7 SCC 169
CST vs. Parson Tools and Plants
Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivandrum vs. T.P. Kunhaliumma
Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Nandini J. Shah
M.P. Steel Corporation vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Mukri Gopalan vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker
Mukri Gopalan vs. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker
Om Prakash vs. Ashwani Kumar Bassi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.