SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 521

S.V.BHATTI
Sabu Johny – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, SRI.PAUL JACOB (P), SRI.LEO LUKOSE, Adv.
For the Respondent: SR. ADV. N VENKITARAMAN ADV. AKHIL SURESH SPL.G.P. SRI.P.RAVINDRANATH SPL. G.P. SRI P.N. SANTHOSH KUMAR DR.THUSHARA JAMES, GP SMT.M.M. JASMIN, ADV

JUDGMENT :

[WP(C)33231/2018, WP(C).1824/2018, WP(C).11585/2018, WP(C).20193/2018, WP(C).21595/2018, WP(C).24482/2018, WP(C).25170/2018, WP(C).29183/2018]

Heard Sri Bechu Kurian, the learned Senior Counsel and Sri M.Ajay, Sri Bhagavat Singh, Dr.Sebastian Champappilly the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. N.Venkitaraman, the learned Senior Counsel for the respondents.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the parties, keeping in view the similarity of writ prayers in this batch of writ petitions, have treated WP(C) Nos.33231, 29183, 24482, 25170 and 1824 of 2018 as the lead Writ Petitions, referred to the pleadings and documents in these writ petitions and canvassed their respective prayers. The learned counsel Sri Bechu Kurian, appearing for the petitioner in WPC No.33231 of 2018, Mr.M.Ajay, Mr.Bhagavath Singh and Dr.Sebastian Champappilly, the learned counsel for the petitioner in WPC No.29183 of 2018 and other two cases have made detailed arguments, and the other counsel appeari









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top