SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 959

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, N.NAGARESH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Haji C. M. Abdul Khader – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI.K.R.RAJKUMAR, SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)
For the Respondent ; SRI.RANJITH VARGHESE, SRI.RAHUL VARGHESE, SMT.SANTHA VARGHESE, SRI.K.L.VARGHESE SR.

JUDGMENT :

Nagaresh, J.

Aggrieved by the order and decree dated 18.12.2014 in O.P.(Arb) No.21/2009 of the District Court, Thalassery, the Union of India has preferred this appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2. The Executive Engineer, Kannur Central Division of CPWD invited tenders on 12.01.2005 for the work of construction of bulk services and development to RTC.III, CRPF, Peringom, Kerala. The work included construction of internal roads, peripheral roads, culverts, drains, parade ground and one RCC bridge. The estimated cost was Rs.5,30,58,016/-and the time allowed for execution of work was 18 months. The respondent-Claimant was awarded the work. In the agreement executed between the parties, it was agreed that if the prices of materials and/or wages of labour required for execution of the work increase, the Contractor shall be compensated for such increase. However, no escalation shall be paid for work executed in extended contract period. It was also stipulated that no such compensation shall be payable for a work for which the stipulated period is equal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top