SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Ker) 864

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Balu Gopalakrishnan S/o A.B. Gopalakrishnan – Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala Rep. by Secretary – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 22965 of 2020
Decided On : 01-12-2020

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Jaykar K.S.
For the Respondent: Sri. Tek Chand.

Important points:
Normally the complainant has the right to choose any court having jurisdiction and the accused cannot dictate where the case against him should be tried. Even so, the process of justice should not harass the parties and from that angle the court may weigh the circumstances

Headnote:

Constitution of India-Art.226-It is not the case of any close relative of the pregnant woman, that there was culpability or negligence on the part of the doctors or other staff-Before entertaining the PIL should ensure that the PIL is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury- The Court should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the public interest litigation

Statement of facts:

The petitioner, is a lawyer by profession. He wants to bring to the attention of this Court an untoward incident, wherein a fully pregnant lady, who according to him, was made to run for 14 hours, by the District Medical authorities, resulting in the death of her twin children.

Finding of the court:

Patient was given treatment and discharged on request- Petitioner has alleged culpability, due to the death of twin babies, and sought for the reliefs stated supra-Petitioner is not personally aggrieved, he cannot prefer a complaint to the court of competent jurisdiction, it is well known that criminal law can be set in motion by anybody- As regards deprivation of fundamental rights to the foetus, it is to be noted that on request, the patient got discharged and travelled-There are no supporting materials to substantiate the case of the petitioner in the writ petition.

Result: Writ petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. Mr. Balu Gopalakrishnan, the petitioner herein, is a lawyer by profession. He wants to bring to the attention of this Court an untoward incident, wherein a fully pregnant lady, who according to him, was made to run for 14 hours, by the District Medical authorities, resulting in the death of her twin children.

2. The incident happened as a result of sheer apathy of the Government machinery, having scant regard to human lives. It had happened before also at the same Medical College Hospital, which is supposed to be the tertiary care centre in a district. A month before, four pregnant ladies were denied admission to the Medical College, citing they had COVID symptoms, and were referred to Perinthalmanna Government Hospital, 25 Kms and 40 minutes away. The public had to intervene and the 4th respondent was constrained to take the patients in. On 26.09.2020, the hapless lady was turned away citing that the Medical College was a COVID Treatment Centre and Non-COVID patients should seek medical care elsewhere. The 4th respondent is expected to devise its own methods for critically ill patients and not let the patients in a lurch.

3. Even though the Government Doctors are prohibited from private consultation, it is seldom followed. The State should come down heavily on such doctors and be booked under relevant provisions of criminal law. Accountability is about the relationship between the State and its citizens, and the extent to which the State is answerable for its actions. If people in responsible positions are non accountable for such dastardly acts, then the State loses its credibility. It is unfortunate that the police department has not till date registered a crime and started investigating into the deaths. This is not a case of medical negligence. But a brutal crime orchestrated by the system, where there is no value for a precious human life.

4. This Writ Petition is filed to shake the Government from its slumber and to devise methods to safeguard the life of citizens. It is filed on behalf of the two dead children whose fundamental rights to life was curtailed by State apathy. It is filed to tie accountability of the deaths on the erring government servants. It exhorts the need for an investigation to the deaths by the State. It is an endeavour to bring out the unholy nexus between the private hospitals and the doctors who illegally get benefited from the gratis they receive from them, at the cost of a common man. It is filed with a prayer for monetary compensation to the parents of the deceased children, to be levied on the officials who will be held liable for the deaths, after investigation.

5. The reliefs sought for in the writ petition are as follows:

    “(i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, commanding the 1st respondent-State of Kerala, represented by Secretary, Ministry for Health, Social Justice and Women and Child Development, Thiruvananthapuram, to register a case and investigate into the foul play, which lead to the deaths of infants.

(ii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, commanding the 5th respondent- District Police Chief, Malappuram, to investigate into the matter of doctors in the 4th respondent Medical College and 7th respondent hospital having private consultation, and their nexus with the private hospitals.

(iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, commanding the 1st respondent, to declare all emergency care patients to be taken care of without emphasising for COVID certificates.

(iv) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, commanding the 1st respondent, to pay a compensation of Rs.50 Lakhs or such other amount this Court deems fit, to the parents of the deceased children, and to recover the same from the erring o

            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
            1
            2
            3
            4
            5
            6
            7
            8
            9
            10
            11
            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
            supreme today icon
            logo-black

            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

            Please visit our Training & Support
            Center or Contact Us for assistance

            qr

            Scan Me!

            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

            whatsapp-icon Back to top