R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
Shailaja P – Appellant
Versus
Vigilance And Anti Corruption Bureau Director – Respondent
ORDER :
The revision petitioner is said to be a human rights activist. She was the complainant before the Court of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thalassery.
2. The petitioner filed Annexure-I complaint before the Director of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB). The complaint was with regard to the corrupt practices conducted by the officers of the Malanadu Rubber and Other Agricultural and Processing Co-operative Society (for short 'the Society') in relation to the procurement of copra/coconut.
3. Annexure-I complaint was forwarded by the Director of VACB to the Inspector of Police, VACB, Kasaragod unit. After conducting a surprise check and verification of records, the Inspector of Police submitted Annexure-II report to the Director of VACB. This report contained the details of the irregularities noticed during the surprise check and also some recommendations.
4. The Director, VACB forwarded Annexure-II report to the Government. As per the direction of the Government, a vigilance enquiry was conducted by the Dy.S.P, VACB, Kasaragod unit. He submitted Annexure-IV enquiry report stating that the enquiry did not yield any direct evidence to prove the allegations.
5.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.