S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY
Adv. K. G. Suresh S/o. K. V. Gopalan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Ministry For Law And Social Welfare, Represented By Secretary, Rashtrapati Bhavan, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Manikumar, J.
Petitioner, claiming to be an Advocate practicing in the Pathanamthitta courts, has filed the instant writ petition, seeking the following reliefs:-
(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the right of the Advocates/Legal practitioners to represent the either parties before the Tribunal/Appellate tribunals/court, constituted under Act 56 of 2007.”
2. Facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are that petitioner has challenged the validity of Section 17 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, (Act 56 of 2007). He has contended that the said provision is against the authority or right conferred by Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, which speaks about the right of advocates to practice.
3. Petitioner has further stated that Government of India have notified Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, with effect from 15.06.2011, which according to him,
A. Latha Sumam v. District Collector, Alappuzha and Others
Aeltemesh Rein v. Union of Indian
Latha Sunam v. District Collector, Alappuzha
Lingappa Pochanna Appealwar v. State of Maharashtra and another
Paramjit Kumar Saroya and Ors. v. The Union of India and Ors.
Smt. Hemlata Kantilal Shah Vs. State of Maharashtra and another
The Quarry Owners Association v. The State of Bihar and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.