KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
... – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
ORDER :
Dated this the 7th day of June, 2022 This Crl.M.C. has been filed to quash Annexure A1 FIR in Crime No.482/2021 of Mukkom Police Station, Kozhikode Rural u/s 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.).
2. The petitioners are brothers. They have been arrayed as the accused in the crime mentioned above. The 4th respondent is the wife of the first petitioner. She is a member of a Scheduled Caste. The petitioners are not members of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe.
3. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 376, 420, 506 r/w 34 of IPC and S.3(1) (w)(i) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the SC/ST Act). The crime was registered pursuant to a private complaint filed by the 4th respondent at the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thamarassery. Annexure A2 is the copy of the private complaint.
4. Admittedly, the first petitioner got acquainted with the 4 th respondent during 2020 and the said relationship developed into intimacy. Later, they got married on 28/4/2021 at Sreekrishna Temple according to customary rites. Annexure A3 is the true copy of the relevant page of the marriage r
State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy and Others (1977) 2 SCC 699
Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia and Others v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre and Others (1988) 1 SCC 692
Satvinder Kaur v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) (1999) 8 SCC 728
Pratibha Rani v. Suraj Kumar (1985) 2 SCC 370
M/s.Neeharika Infrastucture Pvt. Ltd v. State of Maharashtra & Others
Union of India v. State of Maharashtra and Others
Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.