P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN
Rajan, S/o. Nanu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellants are the accused in S.C No.787/2001 on the file of the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Adhoc), II, Kollam. Above case is charge sheeted by the Sub Inspector of Police, Paravoor against the appellants alleging offence punishable under Section 55(a) and (h) of the Kerala Abkari Act.
2. The prosecution case is that the accused was found in possession of arrack in MO 1 to MO 3 cannases. Hence it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.
3. To substantiate the case, the prosecution examined PW1 to PW5. Exts.P1 to P6 are the exhibits marked on the side of prosecution. MO 1 to MO 6 are the material objects.
4. After going through the evidence and documents in this case, the trial court found that the accused committed the offence under Section 8 (1) of the Kerala Abkari Act. Accordingly, the accused is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, this Crl. Appeal is filed.
5. Heard.
6. Learned counsel for the appellants submitted that there is no forwarding note in this case. Moreover the learned counsel also submitted that PW.5 is the Investigating Officer. H
Gireesh @ Manoj v. State of Kerala
Vijayan @ Pattalam Vijayan and another v. State of Kerala
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.