C. S. DIAS
S. Surendran, S/o. R. Sadasivan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Can court fee be refunded after the suit is decided on merits is the question that arises for consideration?
2. The plaintiff in O.S. No.04/2018 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kasaragod, has filed the original petition challenging Ext.P6 order. The respondents are the defendants in the suit.
3. The skeletal facts leading to Ext.P6 order are as follows:
(ii) By Ext.P1 judgment, the court below dismissed the suit.
(iii) The petitioner filed I.A. No.127/2019 (Ext.P2) for the refund of the court fee and the legal benefit fund stamps.
(iv) As there was a delay on the part of the court below in disposing Ext.P2 application, the petitioner filed O.P(C) No.1690/2019 before this Court. This Court orally observed that the petitioner’s remedy is to seek for the return of the plaint, plaint documents and court fee.
(v) Accordingly, the petitioner filed I.A. No.170/2019 (Ext.P3) for the return of the plaint, plaint documents, court fee and legal benefit fund stamps.
(vi) By Ext.P5 judgment, this Court had directed the court below to dispose Ext.P3 application within 15 days.
(vii) The court below, b
Abdul Azeez v. Nedungadi Bank Ltd. & others [2017 (2) KHC 389]
Janaki Amma v. Krishnan [1978 KLT 463]
Linsaraj v. State of Kerala [2018 (1) KLT 626]
Popat and Kotecha Property v. State Bank of India Staff Assn.
Secy. to Govt. of Madras v. P.R. Sriramulu [(1996) 1 SCC 345]
Simi Salim and Anr. v. M/s.Tip Top Furniture industries and Ors. reported in 2016 (1) KHC 643
Thulaseedharan P.C. v. Renie Fernandez and Another [2022 (4) KHC 417]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.