SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 177

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
Unais, Son of Hamsa and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The District Collector, Palakkad, Kenathuparambu, Kunathurmedu, Palakkad District, PIN – 678013 and Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C) Nos.23, 92, 113, 189 and 785 of 2023
Decided On : 13-01-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: P.M. Ziraj, Irfan Ziraj.
For the Respondents: Smt. Deepa Narayanan, Sr. GP.

Mere presence of vehicles in a quarry does not constitute an offense unless they are found carrying minerals without Mineral Transit Passes.

Headnote:Seizure - Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 - The court discussed the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 in relation to the seizure of Tipper Lorries/Excavators allegedly used for contravening these laws. The court referred to previous judgments and government orders to interpret the legal provisions. The court held that the mere presence of vehicles in a quarry does not constitute an offense unless they are found carrying minerals without Mineral Transit Passes. The court also clarified that the vehicles need not be found actually carrying illicit minerals for seizure proceedings to be initiated. Based on these interpretations, the court ordered the release of the seized vehicles.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the seizure of their Tipper Lorries/Excavators, claiming that the vehicles were not involved in any illegal mining activities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the seizure of the vehicles was not legally sustainable as they were not found carrying or transporting illicit minerals.

Ratio Decidendi:

Mere presence of vehicles in a quarry does not constitute an offense unless they are found carrying minerals without Mineral Transit Passes. Actual loading of lorries or excavation of minerals is not necessary to seize a vehicle/Excavator. Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the release of the seized vehicles to the petitioners/owners.

JUDGMENT :

1. In all these writ petitions, the petitioners are aggrieved by seizure of their Tipper Lorries/Excavators alleging that the vehicles were used for contravening the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015.

2. It is the specific case of the petitioners that when the seizure of the vehicles was made, the Tipper Lorries were empty, not loaded by any minor minerals. The JCBs were not found involved in any activity of mining any minerals. Therefore, going by the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.40240 of 2022, the Lorries and Excavators are liable to be released.

3. Senior Government Pleader entered appearance on behalf of the respondents and resisted the writ petitions. The Senior Government Pleader submitted that the findings of this Court in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.40240 of 2022 are not legally sustainable and a Review Petition is being filed to review the said judgment.

4. The Senior Government Pleader relied on the counter affidavit in W.P.(C) No.23 of 2023, and stated that as instructed by this Court in the judgment dated 26.06.2016 in W.P.(C) No.14605 of 2015 and connected cases and in the judgment dated 26.05.2016 in W.P.(C) No. 17365 of 2016 and connected cases, the Government had issued order for streamlining the compounding of offences as per G.O(Ms) No.51/2017/ID dated 21.06.2017 and in the said order it is categorically stated that the compounding fee for all the equipment/tools, empty vehicles seized in connection with illicit extraction shall be Rs.25,000/-.

5. In judgment dated 26.06.2016 in W.P.(C) No.14605 of 2015, this Court has classified the vehicles seized in connection with illegal mining and transport of minerals into three batches and the second batch of Lorries seized were classified as the goods vehicles and JCB that are seized at the site from which the excavation was being done. The Government had issued the Government Order mentioned above after detailed consideration of the judgment of this Court and specific mention was made regarding compounding fee of empty vehicles and it was included in the said Government Order.

6. In these cases also, the vehicles were seized not for illegal transport of mineral (as the lorries were standing stationary in the quarry) but for using the same in illegal extraction of mineral as per Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and as per Rule 108(4) of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015. In the judgment in W.P.(C) No.10387 of 2020, this Court has pointed out that illegal extraction of minerals, without requisite permit or in violation of the permit conditions, will amount to theft under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. In fact, the vehicle owners/drivers were engaged in theft of minerals using their vehicles. Hence, the act of the competent authority in seizing all the vehicles/tools/equipment involved in illegal mining is as per law, contended the Senior Government Pleader.

7. This Court in W.P.(C) No.40240 of 2022 held as follows:-

    “The Mahazar does not indicate that those Lorries were loaded or being loaded with laterite stone for illegal transportation. Mere presence of vehicles in a quarry by itself cannot constitute an offence. Only if a vehicle or a receptacle is found carrying minerals without Mineral Transit Passes, that an offence can be made out. In the circumstances of the case, the seizure of the vehicles of the petitioners which were not found carrying or transporting illicit minerals is illegal.”

8. The Senior Government Pleader relied on Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and pointed out that whenever any person raises, transports or cause to be raised or transported, without any lawful authority, any mineral from any land, and for that purpose, uses any tool, equipment, vehicle or any other thing, such mineral, tool, equipment, vehicle or any other t

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top