IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
Rajalekshmi P., W/o. Sureshkumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department, Government Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 6788 of 2023
Decided On : 28-02-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 3, 15A, 31, 31A - Formation of the Temple Advisory Committees - Temple Advisory Committee - Objectives of Temple Advisory Committees - Whether administrative officials and employees and also employees connected with religious rites are functioning properly - Temple Advisory Committee of a temple under management of Travancore Devaswom Board, which consists of devotees who fall under eligibility criteria prescribed in Clause (3) of Rules framed under sub-section (3) of Section 31A of Act, is duty bound to render necessary assistance to Board and its officials for smooth functioning of temple activities and festivals according to usage. (Para 10)
Finding of the Court :
Provisions of Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board is duty bound to see that regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to practice prevalent in Vellayani Bhadrakali Devi Temple are performed promptly and arrange for conduct of the daily worship and ceremonies and of the festivals in Vellayani Bhadrakali Devi Temple according to the usage. The 7th respondent Temple Advisory Committee, which consists of devotees who fall under the eligibility criteria prescribed in Clause (3) of the Rules framed under sub-section (3) of Section 31A of the Act, is duty bound to render necessary assistance to the Board and its officials for the smooth functioning of the temple activities and festivals according to the usage - Petitioner cannot invoke writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board and its officials to include Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila wards in Vellayani in list for Kalliyoor Dikkubali in Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple, in violation of accepted boundary limit followed from time immemorial.
Result : Writ petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who is the ward member of Ward No.15 of Kuzhithalachal, Kalliyoor Grama Panchayat in Vellayani, has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P17 order dated 24.02.2023 of the 3rd respondent Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 2 to 6 to include Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila wards in Vellayani in the list for Kalliyoor Dikkubali in Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple; and a declaration that Ext.P17 order dated 24.02.2023 of the 3rd respondent is per se arbitrary and illegal and is a fraud on Court.
2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, though the Kuzhithalachlal and Kalluvila are at a distance of 800m from the Kalliyoor Dikkubali thara, the 3rd respondent Devaswom Commissioner issued Ext.P17 order removing the said wards from the Dikkubali Nirapara list of Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple, stating that those are outside the radius of the Dikkubali Thara, i.e., outside the traditional boundary. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court challenging the said exclusion by filing W.P.(C)No.5338 of 2023, which was disposed of by Ext.P14 judgment dated 17.02.2023 recording the fact that vide communication No.ROC 1851/14/PR dated 16.02.2023, which was modified by communication dated 17.02.2023, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Thereafter, Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila were included in the list of places for ‘Pothunirapara’ in Ext.P15 Kalliyoor Dikkubali list. It is alleged in the writ petition that after the disposal of the said writ petition, the 3rd respondent issued Ext.P17 order removing those areas from the said list, relying on a report dated 22.03.2023 of the Assistant Commissioner, Neyyattinkara, stating that those areas are outside the traditional boundaries of the temple.
3. On 27.02.2023, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to get instructions.
4. Today, when this matter is taken up for consideration, a few devotees of Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple got themselves impleaded as additional respondents 8 to 12 in this Writ Petition by the order in I.A.No.1 of 2023. A counter affidavit on behalf of respondents 2 to 6 is placed on record, producing therewith Ext.R2(a) to R2(d) documents. Paragraphs 6 to 12 of the counter affidavit read thus;
7. It is respectfully submitted that the places, Kalluvila and Kuzhithalachal will not come within the accepted boundary limit followed from time immemorial. In 2017, the then Temple Advisory Committee President conducted nirapara in the house of his family members situat
Point of Law : ‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity. Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practice and tradition i....
A writ of mandamus requires the existence of a legal right and a statutory duty, which the petitioner failed to demonstrate, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Only the Temple Advisory Committee can conduct religious rites and collect contributions in temples managed by the Cochin Devaswom Board, as per statutory provisions.
The temple premises cannot be used for conducting mass drill or weaponry training. The Travancore Devaswom Board has the authority to manage the temple and arrange for the conduct of worship and fest....
Point of Law : Section 31A of Act deals with formation of Temple Advisory Committees.
A writ of mandamus can only be issued when there is a clear statutory duty and legal right, which was not established by the petitioners in this case.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to manage temple properties, perform traditional rites, and ensure compliance with statutory duties an....
The duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to arrange for the conduct of daily worship and ceremonies and festivals according to the usage, and the role of the Temple Advisory Committee in assisting t....
Only the Temple Advisory Committee constituted under Section 31A of the Act can conduct activities and collect funds in the temple; unauthorized committees are prohibited from interfering.
Temple Advisory Committees must operate strictly within the authority granted by the Travancore Devaswom Board, and deviations from prescribed conduct can lead to legal challenges and sanctions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.