SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
Rajalekshmi P., W/o. Sureshkumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department, Government Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 6788 of 2023
Decided On : 28-02-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: J. Vishnu, Anu Balakrishnan Nambiar, G.J. Rajmohan.
For the Respondent: Sri S. Rajmohan, Sr. Government Pleader, SrI G. Biju, Standing Counsel, Sri J.S. Ajith Kumar, Smt. A.S. Sangeetha.

Point of Law : ‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity. Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practice and tradition in each temple.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 3, 15A, 31, 31A - Formation of the Temple Advisory Committees - Temple Advisory Committee - Objectives of Temple Advisory Committees - Whether administrative officials and employees and also employees connected with religious rites are functioning properly - Temple Advisory Committee of a temple under management of Travancore Devaswom Board, which consists of devotees who fall under eligibility criteria prescribed in Clause (3) of Rules framed under sub-section (3) of Section 31A of Act, is duty bound to render necessary assistance to Board and its officials for smooth functioning of temple activities and festivals according to usage. (Para 10)

Finding of the Court :

Provisions of Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board is duty bound to see that regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to practice prevalent in Vellayani Bhadrakali Devi Temple are performed promptly and arrange for conduct of the daily worship and ceremonies and of the festivals in Vellayani Bhadrakali Devi Temple according to the usage. The 7th respondent Temple Advisory Committee, which consists of devotees who fall under the eligibility criteria prescribed in Clause (3) of the Rules framed under sub-section (3) of Section 31A of the Act, is duty bound to render necessary assistance to the Board and its officials for the smooth functioning of the temple activities and festivals according to the usage - Petitioner cannot invoke writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent Travancore Devaswom Board and its officials to include Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila wards in Vellayani in list for Kalliyoor Dikkubali in Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple, in violation of accepted boundary limit followed from time immemorial.

Result : Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner, who is the ward member of Ward No.15 of Kuzhithalachal, Kalliyoor Grama Panchayat in Vellayani, has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash Ext.P17 order dated 24.02.2023 of the 3rd respondent Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 2 to 6 to include Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila wards in Vellayani in the list for Kalliyoor Dikkubali in Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple; and a declaration that Ext.P17 order dated 24.02.2023 of the 3rd respondent is per se arbitrary and illegal and is a fraud on Court.

2. Going by the averments in the writ petition, though the Kuzhithalachlal and Kalluvila are at a distance of 800m from the Kalliyoor Dikkubali thara, the 3rd respondent Devaswom Commissioner issued Ext.P17 order removing the said wards from the Dikkubali Nirapara list of Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple, stating that those are outside the radius of the Dikkubali Thara, i.e., outside the traditional boundary. The petitioner had earlier approached this Court challenging the said exclusion by filing W.P.(C)No.5338 of 2023, which was disposed of by Ext.P14 judgment dated 17.02.2023 recording the fact that vide communication No.ROC 1851/14/PR dated 16.02.2023, which was modified by communication dated 17.02.2023, the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. Thereafter, Kuzhithalachal and Kalluvila were included in the list of places for ‘Pothunirapara’ in Ext.P15 Kalliyoor Dikkubali list. It is alleged in the writ petition that after the disposal of the said writ petition, the 3rd respondent issued Ext.P17 order removing those areas from the said list, relying on a report dated 22.03.2023 of the Assistant Commissioner, Neyyattinkara, stating that those areas are outside the traditional boundaries of the temple.

3. On 27.02.2023, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to get instructions.

4. Today, when this matter is taken up for consideration, a few devotees of Vellayani Sree Bhadrakali Temple got themselves impleaded as additional respondents 8 to 12 in this Writ Petition by the order in I.A.No.1 of 2023. A counter affidavit on behalf of respondents 2 to 6 is placed on record, producing therewith Ext.R2(a) to R2(d) documents. Paragraphs 6 to 12 of the counter affidavit read thus;

    “6. It is submitted that Kaliyoottu festival of Vellayani Devi Temple is conducted once in every three years. Goddess Bhadrakali is the presiding deity of the Temple. The sub deities are Lord Shiva, Ganesha, Nagaraja and Madan Thampuram. The Kaliyoottu Festival for this year started on 14.02.2023 and stay for 70 days. The form of worship and customary rituals of the temple are being continued since centuries back. As part of the customary practice and rituals of the temple, Dikkubali is conducted in four Karas of the temple, named Pallichal, Kalliyoor, Koliacode and Pappanamcode. The deity will be taken to all karas during the Dikkubali and Irakki pooja/ Nirapara will be conducted in individual houses and other designated common places within the traditionally fixed boundary limits where the deity can be taken according to the customary practice and rituals of the temple. In each kara a list of houses and places within the respective area where individual Nirapara and Pothu Nirapara are proposed to be conducted will be prepared in terms of the traditionally followed customs and practice of the temple. The limits of each Kara were fixed decades back and the Nirapara will be conducted only within such limits.

7. It is respectfully submitted that the places, Kalluvila and Kuzhithalachal will not come within the accepted boundary limit followed from time immemorial. In 2017, the then Temple Advisory Committee President conducted nirapara in the house of his family members situat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top