HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MR. JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN, MR. JUSTICE MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
VIJAYAN T @@@ THANKARAJ – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner, who is a devotee of Major Vellayani Devi Temple, which is a temple under the management of the 1st respondent Travancore Devaswom Board, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Assistant Devaswom Commissioner, Neyyatinkara Group and the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer of Vellayani Devaswom to give him an opportunity for making Pachappanthal and also allow him to do the traditional activities in which he was involved in the said temple, such as preparing and carrying ‘Theevetti’, etc. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 3rd respondent Assistant Devaswom Commissioner, Neyyatinkara Group and the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer of Vellayani Devaswom to consider his representations, i.e., Exts.P2 and P3 dated 03.02.2025 and 17.03.2025, made before respondents 3 and 4 and grant permission for making Pachappanthal.
2. In the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner submitted representation before the 4th respondent Sub Group Officer, Vellayani Devaswom for permitting him to make Pachappanthal for Aswathy Ponga
Major Vellayani Devi Temple Advisory Committee and another v. State of Kerala and others
Bihar Eastern Gangetic Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. v. Sipahi Singh
A writ of mandamus requires the existence of a legal right and a statutory duty, which the petitioner failed to demonstrate, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
A writ of mandamus can only be issued when there is a clear statutory duty and legal right, which was not established by the petitioners in this case.
Point of Law : ‘Worshipper’ is a person who shows reverence and adoration for a deity. Right to worship is a civil right, of course in an accustomed manner and subject to the practice and tradition i....
Only the Temple Advisory Committee can conduct religious rites and collect contributions in temples managed by the Cochin Devaswom Board, as per statutory provisions.
Only the Temple Advisory Committee constituted under Section 31A of the Act can conduct activities and collect funds in the temple; unauthorized committees are prohibited from interfering.
Point of Law : Section 31A of Act deals with formation of Temple Advisory Committees.
The extension of a Temple Advisory Committee's term without addressing complaints against its members is arbitrary and unjust, warranting judicial intervention and direct administration by the govern....
The Assistant Devaswom Commissioner’s directive regulating elephant parades during temple festivals is procedural and does not constitute grounds for judicial interference, reaffirming the statutory ....
The court ruled that the Travancore Devaswom Board cannot grant permissions for rituals that are not part of traditional practices, emphasizing the need for transparency and the necessity of full dis....
The court ruled that suspended members of the Temple Advisory Committee cannot participate in an Ad Hoc Committee for temple management, emphasizing timely proceedings and investigation into Kuthaka ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.