Back
ALEXANDER THOMAS, C. JAYACHANDRAN
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Uthaman Nayyan, S/o Sankaran N – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Alexander Thomas, J.
The afore-captioned two Original Petitions instituted under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India are directed against the impugned final verdict rendered by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench in O.A(Ekm).Nos.905/2018 and 1222/2018. Petitioners in both the O.Ps are the respondents in the respective O.A's. The sole respondent in the former O.P. is the sole applicant in O.A.(Ekm).No.905/2018. The 4 respondents in the latter O.P are the original applicants in O.A(Ekm).No.1222/2018. It is common ground that the applicants 2 to 4 in the latter O.A(Ekm).No.1222/2018 were already promoted before the verdict was rendered and therefore, their claims had become infructuous. So the claim only in respect of the first applicant in O.A.(Ekm).No.1222/2018 had survived for consideration.
2. The Tribunal after hearing both sides has rendered the impugned common final verdict on 26.06.2019 in the instant O.A(Ekm).Nos.905/2018 and 1222/2018 whereby those O.A's were disposed of with the clear finding that the act of the respondents in the O.A. in not promoting the above respective applicants in these O.As to the post of Principal of Government H
Rule 28(b)(i)(14) of KS & SSR Part II stipulated that Government may by order effect promotions/appointments by transfer notionally without monetary benefit of pay and allowances but with consequenti....
Point of law : Denial of right of the applicant for such reassigned dates of promotion in the post of Associate Professor and Professor would amount to flagrant violation of the constitutional right ....
In case of disputes regarding seniority and matters connected with it by reason of any order of Government or any order of an authority subordinate to Government, representations for reconsideration ....
A promotion is effective only from the date it is granted; there is no fundamental right to promotion, and retrospective promotion cannot be claimed absent specific service rules, even when vacancies....
The delay in conducting disciplinary proceedings after the retirement of the employee violates the principles of natural justice and fairness. Rule 28(b)(i)(14) of the KS & SSR allows notional promot....
The Writ Petition was dismissed as not maintainable due to being filed after the limitation period. On merits, the court found that the promotion of Sri G.K. Venkoba was granted under the reservation....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
