P. SOMARAJAN
Sholly Lookose, S/o. Sasalilookose – Appellant
Versus
V. I. Joseph, S/o. Ipe – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A strange contention was raised before the trial court regarding the counter claim raised on the death of original plaintiff. The legal heirs of original plaintiff were impleaded as supplementary plaintiffs. Thereon a contention was raised that counter claim will stand abated due to non impleadment of the legal heirs of the plaintiff as counter claim defendant in the suit. A counter claim can be raised only against the plaintiff in the suit and it is not permissible even to implead any other person in the suit for the purpose of counter claim. Further, the counter claim should always be within the four corners of the suit, both pecuniary and territory and it should be always against the plaintiff, though it can be by one among the defendants or by all the defendants. The counter claim shall be treated as a plaint and governed by the rules applicable to plaints by virtue of sub-rule (4) of Rule 6A of Order VIII C.P.C.. The said sub-rule has only a restricted meaning and would come into play only on raising a counter claim in a pending suit. Necessarily, the plaintiff/plaintiffs in the suit would stand in the status of a defendant/defendants as against the counter claim, wh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.