Back
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, JOYMALYA BAGCHI
Rajul Manoj Shah Alias Rajeshwari Rasiklal Sheth – Appellant
Versus
Kiranbhai Shakrabhai Patel – Respondent
What is the maintainability of a counter-claim filed against a co-defendant? What is the time limit for filing a counter-claim after issues have been framed in a suit? Can a relief of specific performance be set up by way of a counter-claim?
Key Points: - A counter-claim is treated as a cross-suit and is governed by rules applicable to plaints, including the obligation to disclose a cause of action and pay requisite court fees (!) . - The legislative intent behind Order VIII Rule 6A of the CPC is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings by allowing both the original suit and the counter-claim to be tried and disposed of in a single trial (!) . - A counter-claim must be directed against the plaintiff and cannot be solely directed against a co-defendant (!) (!) (!) . - The relief of specific performance cannot be set up by way of a counter-claim if it is not directed against the plaintiff but solely against a co-defendant (!) . - A defendant cannot be permitted to file a counter-claim after the issues have been framed and the suit has proceeded substantially (!) (!) . - The High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court's judgment by permitting the defendant to file a counter-claim against a co-defendant and not against the plaintiff (!) . - The enquiry and trial arising out of a claim to enforce an agreement to sell is qualitatively different from a claim seeking a declaratory decree against a defendant (!) . - The civil remedy sought by the appellant (declaration of no right to alienate property and annulment of sale) is very different from the attempted civil remedy through a counter-claim for specific performance against a co-defendant (!) . - The appeal was allowed, and the High Court's order permitting the counter-claim was set aside (!) . - The Trial Court had dismissed the application for a counter-claim, holding it was filed after a long time and was an abuse of process, and that a counter-claim is not maintainable against a co-defendant (!) .
JUDGMENT :
PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. Present appeal is against the judgment and order of the High Court of Gujarat1[In Special Civil Application No. 12701 of 2021 dated 16.01.2023] against the order passed by the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad dismissing the interlocutory application2[Exhibit-107/108 dated 05.08.2021 in O.S. No.167 of 2012] filed by respondent no.1/defendant no.2 for amending the written statement and for filing a counter claim in a suit for declaration and injunction filed by the appellant.
3. Facts: Short facts leading to the filing of the appeal are that the appellant, in 2012, instituted an original suit alleging that the property in question, a bungalow in a cooperative housing society situated near Stadium Char Rasta in Ahmedabad, belongs to her father and upon his demise, the said property came to be owned by her and by her brother jointly. However, upon the demise of her brother, the property was jointly owned by the appellant and her sister-in-law/defendant no. 1. In January, 2012, when the appellant came to know that her sister-in-law has agreed to sell a portion of the undivided share of the joint family property in favour of respon
(1) Counter-claim – Relief of specific performance cannot be set up by way of a counter-claim.(2) Counter-claim is treated as a cross-suit and is governed by rules applicable to plaints, including ob....
Counter-claim by defendant – Though normal rule is that subsequent to filing of written statement, counter-claim cannot be filed after issues have been framed, under exceptional circumstances, counte....
A counter-claim cannot be permitted after the framing of issues unless exceptional circumstances exist, which were not present in this case.
A counterclaim directed solely against a co-defendant is typically impermissible; however, if it intertwines with a plaintiff's claim, it may hold validity under commercial agreements.
Counter-claims must be timely and justified; substantial delay without explanation can result in rejection, although courts retain discretion to evaluate circumstances.
Counterclaims may be allowed after closing evidence if justified by circumstances; procedural rules must serve justice.
A defendant cannot file a counterclaim against a co-defendant under the CPC, as the provisions only allow counterclaims against the plaintiff.
A counter-claim can be allowed even after the settlement of issues if it arises from the same transaction or subject matter and preserves the integrity of the legal process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
