ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. AJITHKUMAR
Abdul Khader S/o Kannathuveettil – Appellant
Versus
Rapheal T. George S/o Thekkekkara Joseph George – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.
1. The appellant is the 1st defendant in O.S.No. 44 of 2015, which was one filed by respondents 1 and 2 herein, against the appellant for realisation of a sum of Rs.20,00,000/-, together with interest and cost. In that suit, the defendants were set ex parte and an ex parte decree was also passed on 05.01.2017. Seeking an order to set aside that ex parte decree, the appellant- 1st defendant filed R.P.I.A.No. 20 of 2022, invoking the provisions under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, along with I.A.No. 1 of 2022, which is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking an order to condone the delay of 2110 days in filing the former application. Those applications ended in dismissal by the common order dated 23.12.2022 for the reasons stated therein. The said order is under challenge in this appeal filed invoking the provisions under Order XLIII, Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
2. On 29.03.2023, when this appeal came up for admission, this Court admitted the matter on file. The respondents entered appearance through counsel.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-1st defendant and also the l
Commissioner of Police, Bombay vs. Gordhandas Bhanji
Collector, Land Acquisition vs. Katiji
Chairman and Managing Director, United Commercial Bank vs. P.C. Kakkar
Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Raghunathpur Nafar Academy
G.P. Srivastava vs. R.K. Raizada
In Re: Cognizance for Extension of Limitation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.