IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ.
Cochin Thirumala Devaswom – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Kerala – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 34548 of 2022
Decided On : 14-08-2023
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a temple, sought relief from the court due to delays in receiving final annuity under the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act.Finding of the Court:
The court found that despite specific directions and undertakings by the government, there were significant delays in computing and paying the final annuity entitled by the petitioner.Issues:
Delay in fixing and releasing final annuity, dispute over the extent of land for which annuity is claimed.Ratio Decidendi:
The government has an indisputable obligation to compute and pay final annuity within a specified period as per the provisions of the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act.Final Decision:
The court allowed the Writ Petition, directing the respondents to fix the final annuity entitled by the petitioner within six months.JUDGMENT :
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J.
1. The petitioner-Cochin Thirumala Devaswom approaches this Court ritualistically from 2003 onwards for getting annuity allowed to it under the provisions of the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act, 1976. This Court in the judgment dated 24.08.2006 in W.P. (C) No. 20975 of 2006, Ext.P2, observed as follows:
2. The petitioner subsequently also filed a few Writ Petitions; all yielded positive directions in favour of the petitioner, but the sad plight continues. The officials of the Government even after 52 years after occurring its obligation to pay final annuity as provided in Section 3 and quantified in terms of Section 4(3) of the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act failed to discharge that obligation. In that context, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking the following reliefs:
(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to pay interest @ 12% per annum on the amount fixed as final annuity and pay the arrears with interest 1.1.1970 upto date and cost, in the interest of justice.
(iii) Call for records leading to Ext.P11 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or other appropriate writ or order.”
3. The Writ Petition was admitted on 01.11.2022. The learned Senior Government Pleader took notice for the respondents. A counter affidavit dated 28.03.2023 was filed by the 2nd respondent, wherein the reasons for the delay in ordering annuity have been explained. Paragraphs No. 5 to 16 in the counter affidavit are as follows:
6. The District collector as per the above report has recommended to fix the final annuity as Rs.32,131/- considering 55% of the land as Kanam land. As per section 4(3) of Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act 1976 final annuity to religious or charitable institution of a public nature has to be fixed on the basis of jenmikaram received by the institution. Hence the above report has been returned to the District Collector, Emakulam for resubmission as per section 4(3) of the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act 1976.
7. The District Collector, Ernakulam in his letter I.3-53445/14 dated 26.03.22 reported that the petitioner as per letter B1-75/78 dated 12.08.19 has stated that they have no records regarding jenmikaram on 01.01.1970 and hence the draft roll can't be prepared as per rules. A report in this regard has been submitted to the Government on 30.03.2022. The Government vide letter R1-88/2017/Rev. dated 26.04.2022 directed to fix the final annuity verifying the records at Taluk and village office
The court emphasized the necessity for strict adherence to statutory procedures in annuity fixation under the Kanam Tenancy Abolition Act.
Court cannot issue a direction to Parliament or to the State Legislature to enact a particular kind of law.
The entitlement to annuity benefits under a government policy is an integral part of an acquisition award, and the time limit for claiming such benefits is directory in nature. Additionally, if the S....
Land Tribunals must adhere rigorously to statutory requirements when processing assignments of rights related to religious endowments, ensuring the protection of such properties from wrongful claims.
Under Section 72F, Land Tribunal has to issue notices and determine compensation and purchase price.
The court emphasized the importance of resolving disputed facts through denovo enquiry and directed the completion of the enquiry within a specified timeframe.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.