SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 764

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, P.G. Ajithkumar, JJ.
Shilpa Nair – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 27446 Of 2020
Decided On : 25-10-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Suvidutt M.S Smt.B.Anu.
For the Respondents: Sri.S.Rajmohan, SR. GP. Shri.G.Biju, SC, Travancore Devaswom Board R.Suraj Kumar S.Prem Anand Anjana R.S. Reshma K.Raju.

Point of Law: Court cannot issue a direction to Parliament or to the State Legislature to enact a particular kind of law.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Sree Pandaravaka Lands (Vesting and Enfranchisement) Act, 1971 - Section 6, 6(1) and (2) - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 18 - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Section 2 - Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 - Section 67A, 65 - Person interested - Payment of an annuity - Extinguishment and vesting of certain rights of the Temple - Compensation to the Temple - Seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the State of Kerala to pay the pending dues of annuity - Whether the essential question involved in this writ petition relates to the need of an executive order or legislation - Whether the right, title and interest of the institution in respect of the holding should be vested in the Government in consideration of the payment of an annuity in perpetuity by the Government - Apex Court held that under our Constitutional scheme Parliament exercises sovereign power to enact laws and no outside power or authority can issue a direction to enact a particular piece of legislation. (Para 45).

Findings of the Court: Court are of view that any such increase shall be taking into account prevailing state of affairs, including rate of inflation and change that has been brought about in nature and complexity in administration of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple over a period of time. All same, it is a matter for legislation. This Court is not expected to direct the State to carry out a legislation in a particular manner.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

1. The petitioner, claiming to be a social activist, has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the State of Kerala to pay the pending dues of annuity since 2017 for the properties of Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, Thiruvananthapuram, which were vested with the Government under the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 or as per similar enactments, giving effect to the revision as directed in the judgment of this Court. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the State of Kerala to disburse the annuity, effecting revision thereof upwards by 25% every four years to meet the increase in the expenses due to inflation, with 12% per annum on delayed payment, within a time limit to be fixed by the Court.

2. On 09.12.2020, when this writ petition came up for consideration before the Division Bench of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice, Registry was directed to place the matter before the Division Bench dealing with Devaswom matters.

3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with State of Kerala, Rep. by the Secretary, Parliamentary Affairs and Revenue (Devaswom) Department; State of Kerala, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department; State of Kerala, Rep. by the Chief Secretary; and Travancore Devaswom Board, Rep. by its Secretary as Respondents 1 to 4 in the party array.

4. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1 of 2021 seeking an order to delete respondent Nos.1, 2 and 4 from the party array. In the affidavit filed in support of that interlocutory application, it is stated that, since the petitioner is seeking direction against the 3rd respondent, respondents 1, 2 and 4 are not necessary parties and therefore, they may be deleted from the party array. By the order dated 02.11.2021, I.A.No.1 of 2021 was allowed and respondents 1, 2 and 4 were deleted from the party array, at the risk of the petitioner.

5. The petitioner has also filed I.A.No.2 of 2021 seeking an order to implead the Executive Officer, Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple, as the additional 5th respondent. Since the description of the said respondent was not properly shown in the cause title of that interlocutory application, that application was dismissed, by the order dated 02.11.2021, and the Executive Officer, Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple was suo motu impleaded as the additional 5th respondent.

6. On behalf of the 3rd respondent, counter affidavit dated 07.03.2022 has been sworn to by the Deputy Secretary, Revenue Department, wherein it is stated that the matter relating to payment of annuity is governed by the provisions under the Sree Pandaravaka Lands (Vesting and Enfranchisement) Act, 1971. Under Section 6(1) and (2) of the said Act, an amount of Rs.58,500/- has been sanctioned on annual basis. The annuity for the year 2019-20, though sanctioned, could not be paid due to Covid-19 lockdown, and the amount was surrendered on 10.05.2020. For disbursing the said amount, a request was made before the Secretary, Land Board, on 01.07.2021. The annuity payable till 2018-19 and that for the year 2020-21 has already been sanctioned and paid. The document marked as Ext.R3(a) is a copy of the communication dated 11.11.2021 of the District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram, addressed to the Secretary to Government, Revenue Department. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the 3rd respondent, it is stated that, the proposal to enhance the annuity payable to Sree Padmanabhaswamy Temple is under active consideration of the Government. In the year 2017, Bill No.51 was bought during 14th Kerala Legislative Assembly, in order to amend the Sree Pandaravaka Lands (Vesting and Enfranchisement) Act, 1971. The Bill could not be passed by the Assembly during the tenure of the 14th Kerala Legislative Assembly. That Bill lapsed under Article 196(5) of the Constitution of India, on the dissolution of the 14th Kerala Legislative Assembly. The process initiated

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top