A. BADHARUDEEN
M. N. Saji, S/o. Narayanan Nair – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Krishnakumar, S/o. Ramakrishnan Nair – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This second appeal has been filed under Section 100 and Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, ‘the C.P.C.’ hereinafter) and the appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.21/2014 on the files of the Principal Sub Judge, Kottayam and the appellant in A.S.No.32/2019 on the files of the Additional District Court-II, Kottayam. The appellant impugns decree and judgment in O.S.No.21/2014, dated 7.12.2017 and decree and judgment in A.S.No.32/2019, dated 19.11.2021.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. For convenience, I shall refer the parties as ‘plaintiff’ and ‘defendant’.
4. This appeal has been admitted, raising the following substantial question of law :
5. Facts of the case:
The specific case of the plaintiff before the trial court was that, on 23.1.2022, an agreement was entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant and accordingly, the defendant agreed to sell his half right in the property, having an extent of 3.55 Ares of property, for a total of Rs.14,50,000/-(Rupee
Sri Venkataramana Devaru & Ors. v. The State of Mysore and Ors.
Abubakar Abdul Inamdar v. Harun Abdul Inamdar
Ram Sarup Gupta (dead) by LRs v. Bishun Narain Inter College and others
Kashi Nath (Dead) through Lrs v. Jagannath
Damodhar Narayan Sawale (D) through Lrs. v. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.