C. JAYACHANDRAN
Prasannan – Appellant
Versus
Sreelatha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
The defendants in the suit, O.S.No.447/2022, of the Munsiff Court, Kayamkulam, are the petitioners herein. The suit is essentially one for declaration that a settlement deed executed by the husband of the 1st plaintiff in favour of the 1st defendant is void, non-est and invalid. Recovery of possession of Schedule B to F properties, upon declaring the plaintiffs title, is also sought for.
2. Along with the suit, the plaintiffs preferred I.A. No.1/2022 seeking an injunction restraining the 1st defendant from alienating plaint C to F schedule properties; from effecting further construction in plaint D schedule property; from obstructing plaint J schedule road; and from causing any obstruction to the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint A schedule property. As per Ext.P11 order, the learned Munsiff allowed I.A.No.1/2022 in part, restraining alienation of C to F schedule properties and obstructing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of plaint A schedule property by the plaintiffs. However, the injunction sought for from effecting further construction in plaint D schedule property was rejected. Both plaintiffs and the defendants carried Civil Miscellaneous Appeals from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.