SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 946

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J.
Deepak K. – Petitioner
Versus
The Kerala State Election Commission and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) NO. 15253, 15289 of 2023
Decided On : 06-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Manoj P.Kunjachan, K.C.Vincent
For the Respondent: Shri. Deepu Lal Mohan, SC, Sri. P. Deepak, K.C. Vincent, Irfan Basheer, Nazrin Banu, SRI. Manoj P. Kunjachan

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999, in light of the context and purpose of the statute, emphasizing the conduct leading to disqualification under the Act.

Headnote:

Defection - Local Self Government Institutions - Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999, Section 3A - The judgment discusses the definition of a political party, the conduct leading to disqualification under Section 3(1)(a) and the interpretation of the Act in light of the context and purpose of the statute.

Fact of the Case:

Sri. Mathew Joseph, an elected member of the Thodupuzha Municipal Council, faced allegations of defection by voluntarily giving up membership of the party under whose banner he was elected. Two petitions were filed before the Kerala State Election Commission, challenging his disqualification due to defection. The petitions were dismissed, leading to the writ petitions before the court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that Sri. Mathew Joseph had voluntarily given up membership of the political party under which he was elected, leading to his disqualification under Section 3(1)(a) of the Act. The court also held that the impugned order of the Election Commission was perverse and required interference.

Issues: The issues included whether the party KCMPJJ could be treated as a political party, whether Sri. Mathew Joseph had acquired disqualification under Section 3(1)(a) and 3(1)(b) of the Act, and whether the impugned order of the Election Commission required interference.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted the definition of a political party, the conditions for disqualification under Section 3 of the Act, and the conduct leading to disqualification. It emphasized the importance of considering the context and purpose of the statute in interpreting its provisions.

Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned order, allowed one writ petition, and declared Sri. Mathew Joseph disqualified from being a member of the Thodupuzha Municipal Council.

JUDGMENT :

Sri. Mathew Joseph, an elected member of the Thodupuzha Municipal Council, is alleged to have defected by voluntarily giving up membership of the party under whose banner he was elected. Two petitions were filed before the Kerala State Election Commission alleging that Sri. Mathew Joseph had become disqualified due to defection by voluntarily giving up membership of the party as well as of the coalition of which he was a member. Both petitions were dismissed by the impugned order. These two writ petitions challenge the aforementioned order invoking this Court's jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. Sri.Joseph John and Sri. Deepak, the two writ petitioners, are the elected members representing Ward No.27 and Ward No.3, respectively, while Sri. Mathew Joseph is the elected member from Ward No.11 of Thodupuzha Municipality. The elections to the Local Self Government Institutions were held in the year 2020. Sri. Deepak contested under the banner of the Indian National Congress, while Sri. Joseph John and Sri. Mathew Joseph contested under the banner of Kerala Congress (M) P.J.Joseph Group. Prior to the election, the party, Kerala Congress (M), had split into two factions -Kerala Congress (M) led by Sri. Jose K.Mani and Kerala Congress (M) P.J. Joseph Group, led by Sri. P.J. Joseph. Though disputes arose between the two factions, pursuant to an order of the Election Commission and of this Court, the Kerala Congress (M) led by Sri. Jose K.Mani was given the symbol 'two leaves' while Kerala Congress (M) led by Shri. P.J. Joseph was given the symbol 'chenda’ (drum), resulting in the former becoming known as Kerala Congress (M) (hereafter referred to as ‘KCM’ for brevity) and the latter as Kerala Congress (M) P.J.Joseph (hereafter referred to as ‘KCMPJJ’ for short). KCM was part of the Left Democratic Front, while KCMPJJ was part of the coalition of the UDF group. The coalition of UDF included the INC and KCMPJJ, while the coalition of LDF included the CPI, the CPM and KCM.

3. According to the petitioners, Sri. Mathew Joseph had contested the election as a member of the KCMPJJ with the symbol 'chenda', which was part of a coalition with the UDF. After getting elected as a member of the said party, he voluntarily gave up his membership with KCMPJJ and joined the KCM, which is a coalition group with the LDF and thereby acquired disqualification under Section 3A of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999 (for short, 'the Act). When Sri. Joseph John alleged in his petition that Sri. Mathew Joseph voluntarily gave up membership of KCMPJJ, Sri. Deepak alleged that Sri. Mathew Joseph voluntarily gave up membership of the coalition of UDF and thereby incurred disqualification.

4. Sri. Mathew Joseph opposed the petitions and contended that though he contested the elections of the Thodupuzha Municipality under the symbol 'chenda', in the elections of 2020, he had not given up membership of the party -Kerala Congress (M) and that he still continues as a member of KCM as a Councillor in the Thodupuzha Municipality. However, he denied knowledge of any split in the KCM or whether Sri. P.J. Joseph was declared as the Chairman of KCMPJJ or of any merger, as alleged. The respondent also denied the allegation of having joined any political party or even having any connection with the CPI (M) party.

5. Both petitions were tried together by the Election Commission. The original petitioners before the Election Commission examined PW1 to PW7 and marked Ext.A1 to A16, while the respondent examined himself as RW1. Seven documents were marked as Ext X1 to Ext X7. By the impugned order, the State Election Commission came to the conclusion that there was no cause of action to construe a situation warranting disqualification and dismissed both petitions.

6. Sri. K.C. Vincent and Sri. Manoj P. Kunjachan, the learned counsel for the petitioners, vehemently contended that the impugned order of the State Electi

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top