SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
AMIT RAWAL, C.S. SUDHA, JJ.
Muhammed Naeem V.T, S/o.V.T. Shereef – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala - Respondent
W.A.No.370 of 2023 & W.A.No.398 of 2023
Decided on : 17-11-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : ADV K.MOHANAKANNAN
For the Respondent: ADVS.ANISON M R, SRI. P.C.SASIDHARAN (B/O), STANDING COUNSEL, NAVANEETH.N.NATH, SANEL CHERIAN, K.S.STEJO, ABHIRAMI S.
GAUTHAM KRISHNA E.J., SRI JUSTIN JACOB, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Headnote:

NTC - Qualification Dispute - 10(a)(ii) of Part II KS & SSR - Ext.P2, Ext.P8, Ext.P11 - The court held that NTC is not a lower qualification of Degree or Diploma in Engineering and acquisition of such a Degree or Diploma does not pre-suppose the acquisition of NTC.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the inclusion of degree and diploma holders without NTC in the rank list for the post of Meter Reader/Spot Biller in the Kerala State Electricity Board. They argued that NTC is not a lower qualification of a degree or diploma in engineering and that a degree or diploma in engineering does not presuppose the acquisition of NTC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that NTC is not a lower qualification of Degree or Diploma in Engineering and acquisition of such a Degree or Diploma does not pre-suppose the acquisition of NTC.

Issues: The issues considered were whether NTC is a lower qualification of a degree or diploma in engineering and whether a degree or diploma in engineering presupposes the acquisition of NTC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Rule 10(a)(ii) of the Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1958 and previous case law to determine that NTC is not a lower qualification of Degree or Diploma in Engineering and acquisition of such a Degree or Diploma does not pre-suppose the acquisition of NTC.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ appeals, set aside the impugned judgment, and declared that Ext.P11 order cannot have any effect on Ext.P2 notification. It further declared that Degree or Diploma holders in Engineering without having National Trade Certificate in Electrician/Wireman/Electronics trade as specified in Ext.P2 notification are not eligible to be included in Ext.P8 rank list published pursuant to Ext.P2 notification. The rank list shall be recast and only those candidates included in the list who possess the qualifications prescribed in Ext.P2 notification would be eligible for advice/appointment.

JUDGMENT :

C.S. Sudha, J.

These intra court appeals under Section 5 of the High Court Act, 1958 have been filed by the petitioners in W.P.(C). No.8870/2021 and W.P.(C). No.3383/2022 aggrieved by the common judgment dated 07/12/2022 by which the writ petitions have been dismissed. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petitions.

2. The petitioners in W.P.(C). No.8870/2021 are applicants to the post of Meter Reader/Spot Biller in the Kerala State Electricity Board, that is, the third respondent (KSEB) pursuant to Ext.P2 notification published by the second respondent, Public Service Commission (PSC). The petitioners have acquired the National Trade Certificate (NTC) in Electrician/Wiremen/Electronic Trade after undergoing a regular course of study. The certificate course is qualitatively and functionally different from that of diploma or degree course in engineering. As such diploma or degree course cannot be treated as a higher qualification to the ITI course. Apprehending that ineligible candidates are likely to be included in the rank list, the petitioners filed W.P.(C)No.38864/2017. The said writ petition was disposed of by Ext.P7 judgment dated 04/02/2021 in which this Court expressed the hope that PSC would be careful enough to ensure that only those candidates who are eligible as per the notified educational and other qualification would be included in the final rank list. Thereafter, Ext.P8 rank list dated 19/03/2021 was published by the PSC in which the names of ineligible candidates also find a place. Candidates with degree and diploma in Electrical and Electronics are seen included in the rank list. Because of the inclusion of ineligible persons in the rank list, the first petitioner has not been included in the rank list and the second petitioner who would have been placed in the main list has been placed in the supplementary list of Muslims. Hence the writ petition to declare that “Engineering Degree Holders and Diploma Holders” without having “National Trade Certificate (NTC)” in Electrician or Wiremen or Electronics Trade as specified in Ext.P2 notification are ineligible to be included in Ext.P8 rank list; to declare that Rule 10(a)(ii) of Part II KS&SSR is not applicable to the technical qualification prescribed in Ext.P2 notification and to declare that any decision or order, if any of the PSC to include degree and diploma holders who do not have the qualification as specified in Ext.P2 notification for the post of Meter Reader to be illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable.

3. While the aforesaid writ petition was pending, the Government issued Ext.P11 notification dated 21/01/2022 wherein it has been stated that Electrical and Electronic diploma course conducted by the Kerala State Board of Technical Education is a higher qualification of the Kerala Government/Certificate Examination (KGCE) in Electrical Engineering. Hence, the petitioners moved W.P.(C)No.3383/2022 contending that Ext.P11 has been issued by the Government without noticing the fact that the issue regarding qualification is pending in W.P(C). No.8870/2021 and that Ext.P10 interim order is in force. A reading of Ext.P11 would make it clear that none of the relevant aspects were considered by the Government before issuing Ext.P11 order. The said order does not have any retrospective effect and it would not in any way affect Ext.P2 notification published on 28/01/2015 and the rank list dated 19/03/2021. Degree or diploma was never treated as a higher qualification of NTC. The PSC does not have the power to declare it so in the light of the decision in Suma A. v. Kerala Public Service Commission, 2011 (1) KHC 16. Though Ext.P11 will not have any retrospective effect, the petitioners are challenging the same by way of abundant caution. The qualification now declared as a higher qualification as per Ext.P11 is not a qualification notified in Ext.P2. B.Tech degree and diploma cannot be taken as a higher qualification as the same is not an equi

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top