SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 982

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Murali Purushothaman, J.
Muhammadali – Petitioner
Versus
The Village Officer and Ors. – Respondents
WP(C) NO. 34942 of 2023
Decided On : 12-12-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.M.Ziraj, Irfan Ziraj
For the Respondent: Bimal K.Nath, Sr.GP

The authority of the Village Officer to reject an application for demarcation and non-assignment certificates based on objections from the Panchayat is outside the purview of the Village Officer in this context.

Headnote:

Village Officer - Quarrying Permit - Rule 4 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 - Summary: The court addressed the authority of the Village Officer to reject an application for demarcation and non-assignment certificates based on objections from the Panchayat. It emphasized that the Village Officer cannot insist on a No Objection Certificate from the Panchayat for issuance of these certificates, as the permission or objection of the Panchayat is outside the purview of the Village Officer in this context.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner applied for non-assignment certificate, demarcation certificate, and field measurement book for extraction of ordinary earth. The Village Officer rejected the application based on the Panchayat's objection to granting permission for earth removal from certain areas within the Panchayat.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the rejection and directed the Village Officer to consider the petitioner's application for the certificates in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the Panchayat's resolution.

Issues: Authority of the Village Officer to reject the application based on Panchayat's objection, and the requirement of No Objection Certificate from the Panchayat.

Ratio Decidendi: The Village Officer cannot reject an application for demarcation and non-assignment certificates based on objections from the Panchayat, as the permission or objection of the Panchayat is outside the purview of the Village Officer in this context.

Final Decision: The rejection of the petitioner's application was set aside, and the Village Officer was directed to consider the application for the certificates as per the law, notwithstanding the Panchayat's resolution.

JUDGMENT :

The petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application to the 1st respondent Village Officer to issue non-assignment certificate, demarcation certificate and field measurement book in respect of his property comprised in Sy. No. 556/1-8 of Aloor Village for making application before the Geologist for extraction and transportation of ordinary earth, for use in the construction of the National Highway. The said application was rejected by the Village Officer by Ext.P3 communication stating that the Kandanassery Grama Panchayat has, vide Ext. P4, resolved not to grant permission for removal of earth from Ponmalakunnu area in Aloor village coming within the said Panchayat. The petitioner challenges Ext. P3 contending that the Village Officer lacks authority to reject the request for non-assignment certificate and demarcation certificate concerning his property based on the objection of the Panchayat, and it is for the Geologist to consider whether permission has to be granted for extraction of ordinary earth, at the appropriate stage.

2. Heard Sri. Irfan Ziraj, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Bimal K. Nath, the learned Senior Government Pleader.

3. The learned Senior Government Pleader contends that, since the certificates applied for in Ext. P2 are for the purpose of submitting application before the Geologist for extraction of ordinary earth, the Village Officer has rightly rejected Ext. P2 application based on the resolution passed by the Panchayat not to grant permission for removal of earth from certain areas within the Panchayat. Sri. Bimal further contends that, without the Kandanassery Grama Panchayat on the array of respondents, the writ petition is not maintainable.

4. Rule 4 of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') deals with the application for quarrying permit, which reads as under:

4. Application for quarrying permit.—(1) An application for a quarrying permit shall be made in Form A and shall contain the following particulars, namely:—

(a) name, address, profession and nationality of the applicant;

(b) name and quantity of the minor mineral for which the permit is required;

(c) description such as location, survey number etc. of the lands from which the minor mineral is to be extracted;

(d) purpose for which the minor mineral is to be used.

(2) Every such application shall be accompanied by,—

(a) a copy of the survey map of the area, attested by the Village Officer concerned or any other competent officer of the department of Land Revenue having jurisdiction over the area in respect of which permit is applied for or Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records concerned. The area in which extraction is applied for in each survey number shall be demarcated and coloured red in the map;

(b) a certificate of demarcation of the boundaries of areas applied for, issued by an officer of the department of Land Revenue not below the rank of Village Officer who has jurisdiction over the relevant area;

(c) a certificate from the Village Officer concerned to the effect that the land in respect of which quarrying permit is applied for, is not assigned for any special purpose by the department of Land Revenue;

(d) the possession and enjoyment certificate issued by the Village Officer concerned in respect of the land from where the minerals are proposed to be extracted. In case the applied area for quarrying permit is not under the possession and enjoyment of the applicant, then a notarized consent letter from the owner of such land shall be submitted to the effect that he has no objection in extraction of minor mineral by the applicant in the event of grant of quarrying permit by the Department of Mining and Geology. In the event of issuance of letter of intent by the Department of Mining and Geology for the grant of quarrying permit, the owner of the land and applicant shall enter into a lease agreement for sufficient period permitting the applicant to occupy the land for minin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top