KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Xxx – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Rep, By It’s Secretary, Ministry Of Women And Child Development – Respondent
The petitioners are a married couple. This writ petition has been filed seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy of the 1st petitioner on the ground of substantial abnormalities of the foetus.
2. The petitioners were married on 20/5/2023. On 29/10/2023, the petitioners after conducting a medical examination found that the 1st petitioner was pregnant. Later, on scanning, certain abnormalities were found on the head and spine of the foetus. According to the petitioners, on subsequent medical consultation, certain substantial deformities and abnormalities were diagnosed in the head, spine and face of the foetus. Therefore, they decided to terminate the pregnancy and approached the 5th respondent hospital on 22/4/2024 and intimated their willingness to terminate the pregnancy. However, the 5th respondent informed that as the gestational age of the foetus was 25 weeks, termination of pregnancy can be done only after obtaining orders from the court. It is in these circumstances, that the petitioners have approached this court.
3. I have heard Sri.Sidharth O., the learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri.T.C.Krishna, the learned senior panel counsel appearing for the 1st res
The judgment reaffirms the importance of reproductive rights and decisional autonomy of women, as well as the legal provisions under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971, and Article 21 of ....
The court affirmed the right to terminate a pregnancy with substantial foetal abnormalities, emphasizing reproductive autonomy and health risks under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.
The court reaffirmed the right to terminate a pregnancy based on substantial fetal abnormalities impacting health under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act.
The right to terminate a pregnancy beyond specified limits is upheld when substantial fetal abnormalities are confirmed.
The court affirmed the right to terminate pregnancy in cases of substantial foetal abnormalities, emphasizing the necessity of medical opinion in protecting the mother's health and reproductive choic....
The right to terminate a pregnancy with substantial abnormalities is upheld under the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, emphasizing women's rights and health considerations.
The judgment affirms the fundamental right to reproductive autonomy, emphasizing that termination of pregnancy is permissible based on substantial foetal abnormalities regardless of gestational age.
Termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks is permissible under Section 3(2B) of the MTP Act when a medical board confirms substantial fetal abnormalities, as reproductive choice is a constitutionally ....
Recent amendments to the MTP Act, 1971 permit termination of pregnancy beyond 24 weeks in case of substantial foetal abnormalities, and the Court's decision is based on the interpretation of the MTP ....
The court affirmed the right to terminate a pregnancy with substantial foetal abnormalities, emphasizing the importance of medical opinion and reproductive autonomy under Article 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.