IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, C.S. SUDHA, JJ.
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
C. Kunhikkamma – Respondent
WA No. 2230 of 2019
Decided on : 16-02-2024
Headmasters - Appointment and Eligibility Criteria - Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (KER) - Rule 44A of Chapter XIV-A, Rule 3 of Chapter XXVI - The court discussed the eligibility criteria for appointment and higher grade promotion of Headmasters in Aided Complete Secondary Schools under the Kerala Education Rules, 1959. The conflicting interpretations of the rules and government orders were considered, and the court held that completion of 7 years of service in the pay scale of Headmaster is the requirement for getting the first grade pay for Headmasters of Aided Complete Secondary Schools.
Fact of the Case:
The Writ Appeal was filed against the judgment dated 26.09.2018 in W.P.(C) No.12564 of 2018. The challenge in the Writ Petition was against orders directing curative action and recovery of excess amount paid to a respondent who claimed higher grade on completing seven years of service in the post of Headmaster.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that completion of 7 years of service in the pay scale of Headmaster is the requirement for getting the first grade pay for Headmasters of Aided Complete Secondary Schools, based on the interpretation of Kerala Education Rules, 1959 and relevant government orders.
Issues: The main issue was the eligibility criteria for higher grade promotion of Headmasters in Aided Complete Secondary Schools, based on conflicting interpretations of the rules and government orders.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that completion of 7 years of service in the pay scale of Headmaster is essential to get the higher grade, based on the provisions of Rule 44A of Chapter XIV-A and Rule 3 of Chapter XXVI of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959.
Final Decision: The court declared the judgment in W.A.No.1577 of 2010 and connected cases as per incuriam and affirmed the view taken in W.A.No. 1886 of 1997 that completion of 7 years service in the pay scale of Headmaster is the requirement for getting the first grade pay for Headmasters of Aided Complete Secondary School.
ORDER :
P.G.Ajithkumar, J.
Prayer for interim relief in the Writ Appeal stating that in the circumstances stated in the appeal memorandum, the High Court be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the judgment dated 26.09.2018 in WP(C) No.12564/2018, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal in the interest of justice.
The Headmasters in Aided Complete Secondary Schools shall ordinarily be appointed according to the seniority from among the graduate teachers having necessary test qualifications (Rule 44A in Chapter XIV-A of the Kerala Education Rules, 1959 (KER). Subject to that, teachers put in 12 years of continuous service are eligible to be appointed as Headmasters (Rule 44A in Chapter XIV-A of the KER). Rule 3 of Chapter XXVI of KER provides that a Headmaster of an Aided Complete Secondary School shall be given departmental Headmaster’s scale of pay only if he has put in minimum of 16 years of continuous service as graduate teacher. The Government issued G.O.(Ms) No.88/83/G.Edn. dated 30.05.1983 and G.O.(Ms) No.50/ 2001/G.Edn. dated 13.02.2001 entitling Headmasters of secondary schools a higher grade on their completing seven years of service. The question that arose before the Division Bench was whether service of seven years in the post of Headmaster is enough or whether service in the pay scale of the Headmaster is essential to get higher grade. It was noticed that a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1886 of 1997 held as per the judgment dated 10.12.1999 that 7 year service in the scale of pay of Headmaster is the eligibility requirement for higher grade. Another Division Bench as per the judgment dated 05.07.2016 in W.A.Nos.1577 of 2010 and connected cases took the view that service of seven years in the post of Headmaster is enough to get the higher grade. Confronted with those conflicting decisions, the Division Bench as per the order dated 05.10.2020 referred to a larger Bench and thereby this matter is placed before us.
2. This Writ Appeal was filed against the judgment dated 26.09.2018 in W.P.(C) No.12564 of 2018. The challenge in the Writ Petition was against Exts.P2 and P3 orders. Ext.P2 was issued by the 2nd appellant directing the 3rd appellant asking to take curative action in regard to the order allowing higher grade to the respondent on completing seven years of service in the post of Headmaster. Ext.P3 is the order issued by the 3rd appellant refixing the pay of the respondent reckoning that she became eligible for the higher grade only on completion of seven years in the scale of pay of the Headmaster. Ext.P3 order also directed recovery of the excess amount paid.
3. The Writ Petition was allowed as per the impugned judgment by placing reliance on Ext.P7 judgment in W.A.No.1577 of 2010 and connected cases, wherein it was held that a graduate teacher who put in seven years of service in the post of Headmaster is eligible for higher grade in the scale of the Headmaster, notwithstanding the fact that he/she has not been granted the scale of Headmaster. In the Reference Order, it is pointed out that Ext.P7 judgment was in direct conflict with the judgment in W.A.No.1886 of 1997, which was disposed of along with W.A.No.826 of 1997 and a few other cases. The Division Bench made the reference observing as follows:
13. Rule 3 of Chapter XXVI of KER reads as under:
"3. The Headmaster of an Aided complete Secondary School/Training School shall be given the Departmental Headmaster's scale of pay only if he has put in a minimum of 16 years of continuous service as graduate teacher in schools
National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16 SCC 680
Sandeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 16 SCC 623
Completion of 7 years of service in the pay scale of Headmaster is the requirement for getting the first grade pay for Headmasters of Aided Complete Secondary Schools, as per the interpretation of Ke....
As per Rule 37 of Chapter XIV(A) of KER seniority of a teacher in any grade/in any unit shall be decided with reference to length of continuous service in that grade/in that unit provided he is duly ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of the opposite party as Headmaster in-charge was not equivalent to the appointment as Headmaster, and he was entitled to 'cha....
financial Liability to the State is not a reigning consideration while interpreting statutory rules and notifications.
The court emphasized the need for fair promotional opportunities and highlighted the violation of constitutional rights in the application of rules for promotion/recruitment.
The court affirmed teachers over 50 years are exempt from qualification tests, ruling the denial of a qualified candidate's appointment as Headmaster was illegal and mandated payment of owed salary a....
Rule 44 reads as appointment of Headmasters shall ordinarily be according to seniority from the seniority list prepared.
Point of Law : Rule 8 of Chapter XIVA KER which deals with procedure with respect to approval of appointments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.