SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 578

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, P.M.Manoj, JJ.
Dr. Geethu K.C and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The Secretary, Kerala Public Service Commission and Ors. – Respondents
WA No. 80 of 2024
Decided On : 21-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: P.M.Unni Namboodiri
For the Respondent: Shri. P.C.Sasidharan, SC, P.Sreekumar, Government Pleader, Sri Unnikrishna Kaimal, Sr. GP

IMPORTANT POINT
The eligibility for applications must be judged with reference to the prescribed date, and individuals acquiring qualifications after the prescribed date cannot be considered.

Headnote:

Cut-off Date Extension - Medical Officer Panchakarma and Assistant Professor of Panchakarma - Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Ashok Kumar Sharma and Others v. Chander Shekhar and Another (1997) 4 SCC 18, Bhupinderpal Singh v. State of Punjab (2000) 5 SCC 262, Yogesh Kumar and Another v Government of NCT, Delhi and Others (2003) 3 SCC 548 - The court discussed the principle that eligibility for applications must be judged with reference to the prescribed date and that individuals acquiring qualifications after the prescribed date cannot be considered. The court also emphasized that any deviation from the rules allows entry to ineligible persons and deprives others who could have competed for the post.

JUDGMENT :

Raja Vijayaraghavan, J.

This appeal is preferred assailing the judgment dated 09.01.2024 in W.P.(C).No.43778 of 2023 of a learned Single Judge of this Court. The learned Single Judge rejected the prayer sought for by the appellants to extend the cut-off date for submitting applications for the posts of Medical Officer Panchakarma and Assistant Professor of Panchakarma to enable the appellants to appear for the exam.

2. To appreciate the contentions raised by the appellants in this appeal, brief facts of the case are required to be stated:

The appellants herein are the final-year MD students pursuing education in various Ayurveda Colleges in the State of Kerala. According to them, the final year exams ordinarily used to be held in November, and the results were published in December. However, insofar as they are concerned, the current year’s exams have been scheduled to be conducted in February. While so, a notification to the posts of Medical Officer Panchakarma and Assistant Professor of Panchakarma had been announced by the Public Service Commission with a cut-off date on 31.01.2024. The grievance of the appellants is that the results of their final year exam would be published only by April, 2024. Under the aforesaid circumstance, they had submitted a representation before the 1st respondent with a request to extend the application period to 30th of April, 2024. Their request was not considered by the 1st respondent. It was in the above circumstances that the appellants had approached the learned Single Judge seeking to direct the Kerala Public Service Commission to take steps to extend the cut-off date for the posts of Medical Officer Panchakarma, and Assistant Professor Panchakarma, from 31.01.2024 to 30.04.2024 to enable them to get an opportunity to apply for the posts upon completing their MD/PG Course.

3. The learned Single Judge noted that the notification had set 31.01.2024 as the last date for submitting applications in order for the appellants to have acquired minimum qualifications prior to the cut-off date. The learned Single Judge was of the view that this date could not be extended under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed.

4. We have heard Sri.Unni Namboodiri, the learned counsel for the appellants, who vehemently asserted that the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge cannot be sustained under law.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the prayer sought for has since become infructuous as the test has already been held and the results published.

6. We have considered the submissions advanced and have carefully gone through the records.

7. The prayer of the appellants, essentially, is that the notification issued by the Public Service Commission which fixed the last date on 31.01.2024 for applying to the post of Medical Officer Panchakarma, and Assistant Professor of Panchakarma has to be extended till the end of April, 2024 to enable them to appear for the exams. Such a request has been raised by the appellants on the ground that previous exams for the post of Medical Officer, Panchakarma had been held in 2011 while that for the post of Assistant Professor, Panchakarma had been held in 2016. They contend that if the exams are held prior to the announcement of their results, they would be denied an opportunity which would hinder their prospects of securing a job.

8. To understand the principle, one need not look further than in Ashok Kumar Sharma and Others v. Chander Shekhar and Another, (1997) 4 SCC 18, wherein the Apex Court has held as under:

    “6. The proposition that where applications are called for prescribing a particular date as the last date for filing the applications, the eligibility of the candidates shall have to be judged with reference to that date and that date alone, is a well-established one. A person who acquires the prescribed qualification subsequent to such prescribed date cannot be considered at all.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top