SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 594

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, HARISANKAR V. MENON, JJ.
Travancore Devaswom Board, Represented by Its Secretary - Applicant
Versus
Deputy Director, Kerala State Audit Department, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit & Ors. - Respondents
DBA No. 5 of 2024
Decided On : 05-07-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant : G. Biju.
For the Respondent: SR. GP- Sri. S. Rajmohan, SC TDB- Sri. G. Biju.

IMPORTANT POINT
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to monitor the proper functioning of administrative officials and employees, maintain religious institutions, and manage properties and affairs of Devaswoms, as per the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act.

Headnote:

Travancore Devaswom Board - Transfer of Officers - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950, Section 15A, Section 24, Section 31 - The court discussed the duties and functions of the Travancore Devaswom Board as per the Act, emphasizing the duty to monitor the proper functioning of administrative officials and employees, maintain religious institutions, and manage properties and affairs of Devaswoms. The court also highlighted the need for proper supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants, and the duty to protect the properties of the deity from wrongful claims or misappropriation.

Fact of the Case:

The Travancore Devaswom Board sought permission to transfer officers working at various posts at Sabarimala, Pamba, Nilakkal, and Erumeli on completion of their tenure, based on an order from the court in 2012. The court considered the credentials of the officers and the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer in making its decision.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while some officers had no adverse remarks, others had adverse remarks in the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer. It granted permission for the transfer and posting of certain officers but directed the Board to take a fresh decision on others, considering the reports and the law laid down by the court in previous cases.

Issues: The issues revolved around the transfer and posting of officers at religious institutions managed by the Travancore Devaswom Board, and the consideration of adverse remarks in the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the duties and functions of the Travancore Devaswom Board as per the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, emphasizing the need for proper supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants, and the duty to protect the properties of the deity from wrongful claims or misappropriation.

Final Decision: The court granted permission for the transfer and posting of certain officers but directed the Board to take a fresh decision on others, considering the reports and the law laid down by the court in previous cases.

ORDER :

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The Travancore Devaswom Board has filed this DBA seeking permission to transfer the officers who are presently working in various posts at Sabarimala, Pamba, Nilakkal and Erumeli on completion of their tenure, and post substitutes to their posts as per Annexure A1 Board order dated 22.06.2024. The affidavit dated 26.06.2024 filed in support of this DBA is one sworn to by the Secretary of the Board.

2. In paragraphs 3 to 6 of the affidavit dated 26.06.2024, the credentials of the officers who are proposed to be transferred as Executive Officer, Sabarimala, Assistant Executive Officer, Sabarimala and as the Administrative Officers of Sabarimala Devaswom, Pamba Devaswom, Nilakkal Devaswom and Erumeli Devaswom have been furnished. The names of those 6 officers, the post presently held by them and the post to which they are proposed to be transferred are furnished in paragraph 7 of that affidavit. The reports dated 15.06.2024 and 21.06.2024 of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer (Superintendent of Police), Travancore Devaswom Board on the credentials of those officers are marked as Annexures A2 and A3.

3. On 28.06.2024, when this DBA came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader sought time to get instructions from the 1st respondent Deputy Director, Kerala State Audit Department, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit. The learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to get instructions on the aspects pointed out by the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer in Annexures A2 and A3 reports.

4. On 04.07.2024, when this matter came up for consideration, we perused the files handed over by the learned Standing Counsel and the written instructions of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer, vide letter No.CT.217/24/TDB/VIG dated 04.07.2024, to the learned Standing Counsel. Along with a memo dated 04.07.2024, the learned Standing Counsel has placed on record a copy of that letter dated 04.07.2024.

5. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board and also the learned Senior Government Pleader for the respondents.

6. During the course of arguments, on a query made by this Court, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board would submit that this DBA is filed pursuant to the direction contained in the order of this Court dated 01.08.2012 in DBAR No.16 of 2010.

7. The learned Standing Counsel has made available for the perusal of this Court a copy of the order dated 01.08.2012 in DBAR No.16 of 2010, which reads thus;

    “Having regard to different aspects touching the management of Sabarimala Sannidhanam, Pampa and Erumeli, including the fact that huge amounts of resources are being managed by those establishments, we are of the view that there is a need to increase the bench mark for transparency of handling those establishments. One mode is to ensure that transfers and postings to those temples are done with information to the High Court. Insofar as the selection of Melsanthi, Keezhsanthi, etc., there is already a situation in place where the High Court, though does not get involved in the selection, has a supervisory eye. We feel that it is abundantly necessary that transfers and postings of all officers to those temples, except clerical staff, should be done only with the approval of the High Court, though the persons are to be identified by the Board. To put this in operation forthwith, it is directed that the identity of persons who have been transferred to Sabarimala in the year 2012 shall be placed before the High Court along with a short report of the track record of each such person. We also need to be told whether the Vigilance Wing of the Travancore Devaswom Board has any role in assessing or in the matter of identifying the officers to be sent to Sabarimala Sannidhanam, Pampa and Erumeli. Insofar as the officers who are now posted therein are concerned, reports shall be placed on record in terms of the aforesaid direction, without

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top