IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, HARISANKAR V. MENON, JJ.
Travancore Devaswom Board, Represented by Its Secretary - Applicant
Versus
Deputy Director, Kerala State Audit Department, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit & Ors. - Respondents
DBA No. 5 of 2024
Decided On : 05-07-2024
Travancore Devaswom Board - Transfer of Officers - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950, Section 15A, Section 24, Section 31 - The court discussed the duties and functions of the Travancore Devaswom Board as per the Act, emphasizing the duty to monitor the proper functioning of administrative officials and employees, maintain religious institutions, and manage properties and affairs of Devaswoms. The court also highlighted the need for proper supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants, and the duty to protect the properties of the deity from wrongful claims or misappropriation.
Fact of the Case:
The Travancore Devaswom Board sought permission to transfer officers working at various posts at Sabarimala, Pamba, Nilakkal, and Erumeli on completion of their tenure, based on an order from the court in 2012. The court considered the credentials of the officers and the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer in making its decision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while some officers had no adverse remarks, others had adverse remarks in the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer. It granted permission for the transfer and posting of certain officers but directed the Board to take a fresh decision on others, considering the reports and the law laid down by the court in previous cases.
Issues: The issues revolved around the transfer and posting of officers at religious institutions managed by the Travancore Devaswom Board, and the consideration of adverse remarks in the reports of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the duties and functions of the Travancore Devaswom Board as per the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, emphasizing the need for proper supervision and control over the acts and proceedings of all officers and servants, and the duty to protect the properties of the deity from wrongful claims or misappropriation.
Final Decision: The court granted permission for the transfer and posting of certain officers but directed the Board to take a fresh decision on others, considering the reports and the law laid down by the court in previous cases.
ORDER :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The Travancore Devaswom Board has filed this DBA seeking permission to transfer the officers who are presently working in various posts at Sabarimala, Pamba, Nilakkal and Erumeli on completion of their tenure, and post substitutes to their posts as per Annexure A1 Board order dated 22.06.2024. The affidavit dated 26.06.2024 filed in support of this DBA is one sworn to by the Secretary of the Board.
2. In paragraphs 3 to 6 of the affidavit dated 26.06.2024, the credentials of the officers who are proposed to be transferred as Executive Officer, Sabarimala, Assistant Executive Officer, Sabarimala and as the Administrative Officers of Sabarimala Devaswom, Pamba Devaswom, Nilakkal Devaswom and Erumeli Devaswom have been furnished. The names of those 6 officers, the post presently held by them and the post to which they are proposed to be transferred are furnished in paragraph 7 of that affidavit. The reports dated 15.06.2024 and 21.06.2024 of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer (Superintendent of Police), Travancore Devaswom Board on the credentials of those officers are marked as Annexures A2 and A3.
3. On 28.06.2024, when this DBA came up for consideration, the learned Senior Government Pleader sought time to get instructions from the 1st respondent Deputy Director, Kerala State Audit Department, Travancore Devaswom Board Audit. The learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to get instructions on the aspects pointed out by the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer in Annexures A2 and A3 reports.
4. On 04.07.2024, when this matter came up for consideration, we perused the files handed over by the learned Standing Counsel and the written instructions of the Chief Vigilance and Security Officer, vide letter No.CT.217/24/TDB/VIG dated 04.07.2024, to the learned Standing Counsel. Along with a memo dated 04.07.2024, the learned Standing Counsel has placed on record a copy of that letter dated 04.07.2024.
5. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board and also the learned Senior Government Pleader for the respondents.
6. During the course of arguments, on a query made by this Court, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board would submit that this DBA is filed pursuant to the direction contained in the order of this Court dated 01.08.2012 in DBAR No.16 of 2010.
7. The learned Standing Counsel has made available for the perusal of this Court a copy of the order dated 01.08.2012 in DBAR No.16 of 2010, which reads thus;
Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom Board and others
A.A. Gopalakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board
The court established that the Travancore Devaswom Board has a robust obligation to manage and protect the properties of Devaswoms, reinforcing the necessity for careful credential scrutiny of staff ....
The Travancore Devaswom Board must verify credentials of officers before postings to ensure integrity and proper management of religious institutions.
Point of Law : When the process of deputation, by calling for option from the officers, etc., requires considerable time, the Board ought to have made such a request, well in advance, in order to ens....
The Travancore Devaswom Board has a statutory duty to manage Devaswoms and must act on reports of misconduct, ensuring timely compliance with court directives.
The court established that the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, reflecting the Board's fiduciary duty to manage religious institutions responsibly and p....
Point of Law : Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 enacted by State Legislature makes provision for administration, supervision and control of incorporated and unincorporated Dev....
Devaswom Boards are trustees with a legal obligation to protect and manage the properties of the Devaswoms, and failure to do so constitutes a breach of trust.
The Cochin Devaswom Board must impose stringent penalties for misconduct by employees to uphold its fiduciary duties under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act.
The appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, including eligibility and probation requirements; failure to do so renders the appointment invalid.
Point of Law : Mandala-Makaravilakku Festival of 1197 ME - Administration - to ensure that sufficient number of staff in the Establishment Wing of the Board and Class-IV employees are deployed for sp....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.