IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISANKAR V. MENON
Suo Motu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
DBP NO. 44 OF 2024
Decided on : 26-06-2024
ADMINISTRATION - DEVASWOM BOARD APPOINTMENTS - Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950 - Sections 15A, 24, 27, 31, 13B - The court discussed the provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, particularly Sections 15A, 24, 27, 31, and 13B, which outline the duties of the Devaswom Board, the management of Devaswoms, and the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner. The court emphasized the Board's fiduciary responsibilities akin to trusteeship, ensuring proper administration and supervision of religious institutions, and the necessity of appointing a qualified Devaswom Commissioner to uphold these duties. The interpretations of these sections influenced the court's decision to appoint a suitable candidate to the vacant position of Devaswom Commissioner.
Fact of the Case:
The court registered a suo motu case regarding the administration of the Travancore Devaswom Board and Cochin Devaswom Board, focusing on the appointment of a Devaswom Commissioner amidst allegations of illegalities and irregularities in administration. The position of Devaswom Commissioner was vacant, and the court was tasked with ensuring compliance with statutory provisions for the appointment.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner is crucial for the effective management of the Devaswoms, particularly during the high-traffic Mandala-Makaravilakku festival season. It emphasized the need for adherence to statutory provisions regarding appointments and the importance of the Commissioner’s role in safeguarding the interests of the deity and devotees.
Issues: The primary issues included the vacancy of the Devaswom Commissioner position, the statutory requirements for appointment, and the implications of improper appointments on the administration of the Devaswom Board.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Travancore Devaswom Board must appoint a Devaswom Commissioner in accordance with the statutory provisions of the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, ensuring that the appointee possesses the necessary qualifications and experience to fulfill the responsibilities of the role effectively.
Final Decision: The court directed the appointment of Sri. C.V. Prakash as the Devaswom Commissioner on deputation for two years, emphasizing the need for the Board to issue formal orders expeditiously and to report any future vacancies to the court.
ORDER :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
This DBP is registered suo motu, in terms of the directions contained in the judgment of this Court dated 25.03.2024 in O.P.No.3821 of 1990, in the matter of Travancore Devaswom Board and Cochin Devaswom Board - regarding the constitution of High Power Committee for Implementation of Sabarimala Master Plan, appointment of Special Commissioner, Sabarimala, appointment of Ombudsman for Travancore Devaswom Board and Cochin Devaswom Board and also matters in relation to the appointment of Chief Commissioner, in the absence of an elected Board in the Travancore Devaswom Board and Cochin Devaswom Board and also the appointment of Devaswom Commissioners. O.P.No.3821 of 1990 was registered suo motu, vide order dated 11.04.1990, in the matter of Travancore Devaswom Board and Cochin Devaswom Board, on the illegalities, embezzlements and irregularities in the administration noticed during the consideration of audit reports.
2. On 25.05.2024, when this DBP came up for consideration, this Court noticed that the post of Devaswom Commissioner in Travancore Devaswom Board is lying vacant. The learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board submitted that the Board has already made a requisition before the 1st respondent State for the deputation of an Additional Secretary to the Government from the Administrative Secretariate. The learned Senior Government Pleader submitted that the said requisition is pending consideration before the Government.
3. On 31.05.2024, along with a memo filed by the learned Senior Government Pleader, the panel containing the names of two Additional Secretaries to Government from the Administrative Secretariate, for appointment on deputation basis as the Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, was placed on record. The learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board sought time to get instructions.
4. By the order dated 10.06.2024, the learned Senior Government Pleader was directed to place on record the details of those who held earlier the post of Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board, on deputation from the Administrative Secretariate. Based on that direction, the learned Senior Government Pleader has made available for the perusal of this Court the details of those who held the post of Devaswom Commissioner on deputation for the period 2013-23 after furnishing a copy of the same to the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board. The learned Standing Counsel has also pointed out the preference of the Board, as stated in the written instructions dated 06.06.2024, for the person to be appointed as Devaswom Commissioner on deputation from the Administrative Secretariate.
5. On 21.06.2024, the learned Senior Government Pleader sought time to place on record detailed service particulars of two Additional Secretaries to Government, included in the panel, for appointment as Devaswom Commissioner on deputation, which was furnished along with a memo dated 21.06.2024.
6. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader for the 1st respondent State and the learned Standing Counsel for the Travancore Devaswom Board for the 2nd respondent on the service particulars and other aspects of two Additional Secretaries to Government included in the panel and also the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel regarding the preference of the Board among the persons included in the panel.
7. The Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act, 1950, enacted by the State Legislature, makes provision for the administration, supervision and control of incorporated and unincorporated Devaswoms and of other Hindu Religious Endowments and Funds. Section 15A of the Act, inserted by Act 5 of 2007, with effect from 12.04.2007, deals with the duties of the Board. As per Section 15A, it shall be the duty of the Board to perform the following functions, namely, (i) to see that the regular traditional rites and ceremonies according to the practice prevalent in the reli
Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom Board and others 1975 KLT 55
Suo Motu v. State of Kerala and others 2022 (2) KHC 411
M.V. Ramasubbiar v. Manicka Narasimachara (1979) 2 SCC 65
A.A. Gopalakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board (2007) 7 SCC 482
The court established that the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, reflecting the Board's fiduciary duty to manage religious institutions responsibly and p....
The judgment establishes that the appointment of Devaswom Commissioners must strictly adhere to the statutory provisions, ensuring judicial oversight in the process.
The Travancore Devaswom Board must verify credentials of officers before postings to ensure integrity and proper management of religious institutions.
The court established that the Travancore Devaswom Board has a robust obligation to manage and protect the properties of Devaswoms, reinforcing the necessity for careful credential scrutiny of staff ....
The appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, including eligibility and probation requirements; failure to do so renders the appointment invalid.
The Travancore Devaswom Board has a statutory duty to manage Devaswoms and must act on reports of misconduct, ensuring timely compliance with court directives.
Devaswom Boards are trustees with a legal obligation to protect and manage the properties of the Devaswoms, and failure to do so constitutes a breach of trust.
Point of Law : When the process of deputation, by calling for option from the officers, etc., requires considerable time, the Board ought to have made such a request, well in advance, in order to ens....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the statutory duty of the Commissioner to ensure the proper administration of religious endowments and the duty of the hereditary trustee to manage....
The Cochin Devaswom Board must impose stringent penalties for misconduct by employees to uphold its fiduciary duties under the Travancore-Cochin Hindu Religious Institutions Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.