IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, G. Girish, JJ.
R.G. Radhakrishnan – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By The Principal Secretary To Government, Revenue (Devaswom) Department And Ors. – Respondents
W.P.(C)NO.43139 OF 2023
Decided On : 31-01-2024
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to call for the entire records leading to Ext.P8 proceedings dated 10.05.2023 and Ext.P23 order dated 12.12.2023 of the 3rd respondent Board and quash the same; a writ of quo warranto or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to remove the 8th respondent from the post of Devaswom Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board; a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 3rd respondent Board to recover the liability found against the 8th respondent in Ext.P2 draft audit note of Thiruvallam Devaswom; a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the State Vigilance to conduct an investigation regarding the corruption and misappropriation of Devaswom funds by the 8th respondent; and a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent State and the 3rd respondent Board to strictly follow the Travancore Devaswom Board Officers’ and Servants’ Service Rules, 2022 in the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner.
1.1. In the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner is a Hindu by birth and a devotee, who retired from service on 31.01.2021 while working as Finance Commissioner in the 3rd respondent Board. In the writ petition, the petitioner has pointed out the directions contained in the order of this Court dated 19.07.2022 in DBP No.22 of 2022, Ext.P4 judgment of this Court dated 01.08.2023 in W.P(C) No.31159 of 2022 and also the pendency of DBP No.40 of 2023.
1.2. On 21.12.2023, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Senior Government Pleader took notice on admission for respondents 1, 2 and 7, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board for respondents 3 to 6 and the learned Standing Counsel for Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board for the 9th respondent. Notice on admission by special messenger was ordered to the 8th respondent. The learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to make available for the perusal of this Court, the files relating to Ext.P23 order dated 12.12.2023 and the learned Standing Counsel for Devaswom Recruitment Board, the files relating to Ext.P13 minutes of the meeting of the Department Promotion Committee held on 24.08.2023.
1.3. On 21.12.2023, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board has made available for the perusal of this Court, the files relating to Ext.P23 order dated 12.12.2023. On 22.12.2023, the learned Standing Counsel for Devaswom Recruitment Board, who took notice for the 9th respondent Departmental Promotion Committee, made available for the perusal of this Court the files relating to Ext.P13 minutes of the meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee held on 24.08.2023. After perusal, the files handed over by the learned Standing Counsel for the Devaswom Board and the learned Standing Counsel for Devaswom Recruitment Board were returned to the respective counsel.
1.4. The 8th respondent has filed a counter affidavit dated 02.01.2024, opposing the reliefs sought for in this writ petition, producing therewith Exts.R8(a) to R8(e) documents. The 3rd respondent Devaswom Board has filed a counter affidavit dated 03.01.2024 and the 9th respondent Departmental Promotion Committee has filed a counter affidavit dated 30.12.2023, opposing the reliefs sought for in the writ petition.
1.5. By the order dated 22.01.2024, the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswom Board was directed to make available for the perusal of this Court, the files relating to the report dated 18.05.2023 of the Finance and Accounts Officer (Report No.FIO/319/23/IAD), the relevant files maintained in the office of the Finance and Accounts Officer, the office of the Devaswom Commissioner and also the Board office, relating to Ext.R7(f) procee
A.A. Gopalakrishnan v. Cochin Devaswom Board
Ajith Singh v. State of Panjab
Ashok Kumar Pandey v. State of W.B.
B. Srinivasa Reddy v. Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board Employees' Assn.
B.Singh (Dr.) v. Union of India
Balakrishnan K.M. v. Assistant Educational Officer, Vadakara
Dattaraj Nathuji Thaware v. State of Maharashtra
Duryodhan Sahu (Dr.) v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra
Gurpal Singh v. State of Punjab
Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Committee v. C.K. Rajan
Hari Bansh Lal v. Sahodar Prasad Mahto
High Court of Gujarat v. Gujarat Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat
M.V. Ramasubbiar v. Manicka Narasimachara
Mor Modern Coop. Transport Society Ltd. v. Govt. of Haryana
Nagpur Improvement Trust v. Vasantrao and others
Nagpur Investment Trust v. Vasantarao
Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India
Rajani P. Kuttan and another v. State of Kerala and others
Rajashtan High Court v. Vedpriya and another
Rajesh Kumar Srivastava v. State of Jharkhand
Ram Mohan Das v. Travancore Devaswom Board and others
Satheesh Kumar v. Travancore Devaswom Board
Shrikumar Padma Prasad v. Union of India
The appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, including eligibility and probation requirements; failure to do so renders the appointment invalid.
The court established that the appointment of the Devaswom Commissioner must comply with statutory provisions, reflecting the Board's fiduciary duty to manage religious institutions responsibly and p....
The Travancore Devaswom Board must verify credentials of officers before postings to ensure integrity and proper management of religious institutions.
The court established that the Travancore Devaswom Board has a robust obligation to manage and protect the properties of Devaswoms, reinforcing the necessity for careful credential scrutiny of staff ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the Travancore Devaswom Board to monitor the proper functioning of administrative officials and employees, maintain religious instituti....
While constituting DPCs, for promotion or by-transfer appointments for selection posts, on the basis of merit-cum-suitability, majority of members would be representing the appointing authority, and ....
The judgment establishes that the appointment of Devaswom Commissioners must strictly adhere to the statutory provisions, ensuring judicial oversight in the process.
Devaswom Boards are trustees with a legal obligation to protect and manage the properties of the Devaswoms, and failure to do so constitutes a breach of trust.
Point of Law : When the process of deputation, by calling for option from the officers, etc., requires considerable time, the Board ought to have made such a request, well in advance, in order to ens....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.