IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
Arun S, S/o Sukumaran Nair G – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondents
Crl.MC No. 5613 of 2024
Decided on : 02-07-2024
Section 119(1)(a) - Quashing of Proceedings - Sexual Gestures Degrading Dignity of Women
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash further proceedings based on an FIR alleging the commission of an offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the Kerala Police Act for showing sexual gestures degrading the dignity of women in a public place.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to disclose the specific sexual gestures or acts performed by the accused, essential for constituting the offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act. As a result, the entire prosecution was deemed meritless and baseless, leading to the quashing of further proceedings.
Issues: The issues revolved around the lack of disclosure of specific sexual gestures or acts in the prosecution materials, which are essential for constituting the offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the performance of specific sexual gestures or acts degrading the dignity of women in public places is an essential ingredient for constituting the offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act. Mere assumption by the investigating officers without discernible evidence would not suffice to establish the offence.
Final Decision: The petition was allowed, and all further proceedings pursuant to the FIR and Final Report were quashed.
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure.A1 FIR and Annexure.A2 Final Report in Crime No.2539/2023 of Attingal Police Station, now pending as C.C. No.45/2024 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal. The petitioner is the sole accused in the above case.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the relevant materials available.
3. Summary of the prosecution case is that, at about 14.30 hours on 16.11.2023, the accused herein showed sexual gestures which would degrade the dignity of women near KSRTC Bus Depot, Attingal, as against prohibition contained in the Kerala Police Act. Accordingly, the prosecution alleges commission of offence punishable under Section 119(1)(a) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011 [hereinafter referred as ‘KP Act’ for short] by the accused.
4. While assailing the Final Report, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that either in the FIR or in the Final Report, the overt acts in the form of sexual gestures at the instance of the accused, which would attract the offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act are not disclosed. He has placed a decision reported in Arun v. State of Kerala [2019 (3) KHC 132 : 2019 (2) KLT 906 : ILR 2019 (3) Ker. 375 : 2019 (3) KLJ 660], wherein this Court considered a similar case and quashed the proceedings therein for want of disclosure of the sexual gestures or acts in the Final Report.
5. The learned Public Prosecutor, though supported the Final Report he also failed to point out what are the sexual gestures or acts performed by the petitioner, which would warrant penal consequences under Section 119(1) (a) of the KP Act.
6. Reading Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act, it has been provided that, any person who,— (a) performs, in public places, any sexual gestures or acts degrading the dignity of women, is an offence. Thus, performing of any sexual gestures or acts in public places degrading dignity of women is the essential ingredient to constitute an offence punishable under Section 119(a) of the KP Act. If the sexual gestures or acts performed by the accused could not be discernible from the FIR, Final Report or other materials, mere assumption of the Detecting Officer as well as the Investigating Officer that the accused performed or showed sexual gestures or acts degrading the dignity of women, keeping the gestures or acts in his mind in secrecy, would not suffice to constitute an offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the KP Act.
7. Since, the prosecution materials do not suggest what actually the sexual gestures or acts performed by the accused, entire prosecution is found to be meritless and baseless. Therefore, the quashment sought for on the said ground is liable to be allowed.
8. Accordingly, this petition stands allowed and all further proceedings pursuant to Annexure.A1 FIR and Annexure-A2 Final Report in Crime No.2539/2023 of Attingal Police Station, now pending as C.C. No.45/2024 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal stand quashed.
Registry is directed to forward copy of this order to the Director General of Police, with direction to forward the same to all Station House Officers in the State for information and future follow up.
AI
The specific performance of sexual gestures or acts degrading the dignity of women in public places is essential for constituting the offence under Section 119(1)(a) of the Kerala Police Act.
Quashment of criminal proceedings is not permissible if prima facie evidence exists to support allegations of sexual harassment and insulting modesty under relevant sections of IPC and KP Act.
The court clarified the applicability of specific sections of IPC and POCSO Act based on the evidence of the case, distinguishing between the roles of the accused.
The court established that the definitions and interpretations of 'obscene acts' and 'public place' under the IPC are broad, and the intent behind actions is crucial in determining the applicability ....
The court emphasizes that to prove misleading conduct under Section 117(d), a definite false statement must be established, which was absent in this case.
Allegations of stalking and obscenity must meet legal thresholds of intent and evidence; mere accusations without substantiation are insufficient for prosecution.
Criminal intimidation and verbal abuse are insufficient to constitute offenses under IPC; necessary sanctions are mandatory for non-cognizable offenses under the Kerala Police Act.
The court established that intent to insult modesty and causing nuisance through communication can warrant criminal proceedings under IPC and K.P Act.
The court confirmed the order taking cognizance under Section 354A IPC and Section 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act while setting aside the cognizance under Sections 500 and 501 IPC due to a legal pro....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.