SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 808

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J.
Dr. P.Sasikumar, S/o. P.Vijayalakshmi - Appellant
Vs.
State Of Kerala, Represented By Secretary To Government, Department Of Registration, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram - Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24363 OF 2024
Decided On : 31-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Jacob Sebastian, Winston K.V, Anu Jacob, Bharath Krishnan G.
For the Respondent: B.S.Syamanthak, GP

IMPORTANT POINT
A rectification deed that corrects clerical errors without creating or extinguishing rights does not incur stamp duty as a conveyance under the Kerala Stamp Act.

Headnote:

RECTIFICATION DEED - STAMP DUTY AND REGISTRATION - Kerala Stamp Act, 1959; Registration Act, 1908; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - The court interpreted the provisions of the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959, and the Registration Act, particularly focusing on the definition of a rectification deed and its implications for stamp duty. It emphasized that a rectification deed is meant to correct clerical errors without creating or extinguishing rights, thus not attracting stamp duty as a conveyance. The court concluded that the 3rd respondent's classification of the rectification deed as a sale deed was incorrect, leading to the decision to set aside the demand for stamp duty.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the 3rd respondent's decision to treat their rectification deed as a sale deed for stamp duty purposes, arguing it was merely correcting clerical errors in a previous sale deed without altering any rights.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the rectification deed did not create or extinguish any rights beyond what was conveyed in the original sale deed. It held that the 3rd respondent's interpretation was erroneous and that no stamp duty was applicable.

Issues: Whether the rectification deed should be treated as a sale deed for the purpose of stamp duty under the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that a rectification deed, which merely corrects descriptions without altering rights, does not attract stamp duty as a conveyance under the Kerala Stamp Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the 3rd respondent's memo, and directed the registration of the rectification deed without the imposition of stamp duty.

JUDGMENT :

The petitioners are aggrieved by the stand taken by the 3rd respondent/Sub Registrar to treat the rectification deed presented by them for registration as conveyance (sale deed), as described under Serial No.21 in the Schedule to Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 (for short 'the Stamp Act'), for the purpose of levying stamp duty.

2. The 1st petitioner, along with other sellers, sold a total extent of 226.88 cents of land in various survey numbers of Kannadi-1 Village in Palakkad District in favour of the 2nd petitioner and other buyers as per Ext.P1 sale deed. Subsequently, it was noticed that the boundaries of various items of properties got mixed up, and the boundaries of some of the properties were wrongly described in the sale deed. According to the petitioners, it was an error that crept in due to a clerical mistake while executing the sale deed. Therefore, the 1st petitioner, along with other sellers in the Ext.P1 sale deed, prepared Ext.P2 rectification deed in favour of the 2nd petitioner and other buyers and presented it for registration before the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent by Ext.P3 memo held that Ext.P2 should be reckoned as a sale deed and the stamp duty as per the prevalent rates should be levied on it. It is challenging Ext.P3, the petitioners have approached this Court.

3. I have heard Sri. Jacob Sebastian, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader Sri. B.S. Syamanthak. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that by executing Ext.P2, the petitioners wanted to correct the mistake that crept in the description of boundaries of some of the items of properties in the schedule of Ext.P1 and it does not create or extinguish any right other than what was conveyed in Ext.P1 and hence the stand taken by the 3rd respondent that Ext.P2 should be treated as sale deed for the purpose of payment of stamp duty cannot be justified. Reliance was placed on the following decisions: Baburaj P.K. & Others v. State of Kerala & Others (2019 (2) KHC 628), Jihas P.A. v. District Registrar and another (2012 (3) KHC 146), Rajesh Kumar K.T. v. State of Kerala (2024 (3) KHC 425), Vannathi Valappil Mahmood v. State of Kerala and Others [2019 (2) KHC 736], Madras Refineries Ltd. v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras [(1977) 2 SCC 308]. On the other hand, the learned Government Pleader submitted that it is not a case of mere correction of the boundaries of certain items of properties which have been misdescribed, but even the identity of certain items of properties have been drastically changed. Therefore, a new right is created which attracts stamp duty as that of a conveyance deed under Serial No.21 in the Schedule to the Stamp Act, submitted the learned Government Pleader.

5. A rectification deed is often executed to correct minor errors or genuine or unintentional mistakes that do not affect the interest or fundamental terms of the original document or change the nature of the transaction. It is a supplementary document that nullifies mistakes and corrections in the original document. The Stamp Act or the Registration Act does not define a rectification deed. By virtue of the powers conferred under Section 78 of the Registration Act, the State Government has notified a Table of Fees for different transactions covered therein. Clause I(s) of the Table of Fees refers to a deed which can be treated as a rectification deed. It gives sufficient indication as to what is a rectification deed. It states that the rectification deed does not create, transfer, limit, extend, extinguish or record any right. Therefore, the wrong description of the boundaries, survey number, or any other description of the property which does not create, transfer or record any fresh right can be rectified through a rectification deed [See Baburaj P.K. (supra)].

6. The Schedule to Kerala Stamp Act, 1959, provides for stamp duty and registration f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top