Back
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. AJITHKUMAR
Kerala Public Service Commission, Represented by the Secretary – Appellant
Versus
Dineesh K. M. , S/o. Muraleedharan K. K. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.G. Ajithkumar, J.
The 1st respondent filed O.A.No.1719 of 2020 before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. He sought to set aside Annexure A5 ranked list to the extent it failed to show him as an other backward community candidate. Consequential reliefs including his advise for appointment were also sought. The Administrative Tribunal allowed the original application. It was, however, directed further that rights of the 2nd respondent, who was already appointed, should not be affected. Kerala Public Service Commission, aggrieved by that order, filed this original petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. Heard the learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala Public Service Commission, the learned counsel for the 1st respondent and the learned Senior Government Pleader.
3. Respondents No.1 and 2 were applicants for selection to the post of Attender Grade II in Homoeopathy Department in Kottayam District. In Annexure A5 ranked list, the 1st respondent was placed at 14 and the 2nd respondent was placed at 18. The 1st respondent claimed reservation available to other backward communities. In his profile, he claimed that he belongs to other backward community and pr
A valid certificate from the revenue authority can establish OBC status without the need for a Gazette notification, especially in cases of caste discrepancies.
The High Court maintains its supervisory role under Article 227, intervening only in cases of manifest errors or injustice by lower tribunals, emphasizing procedural fairness in administrative decisi....
A person who is not aggrieved by an order issued under the Andhra Pradesh (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Backward Classes) Regulation of Issue of Community certificates Act, 1993, does not h....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is the need for thorough verification of caste certificates to prevent ineligible or spurious persons from availing reservation benefits, in line ....
A fraudulent document is non est from the beginning and cannot be countenanced in law. A party to a litigation cannot approbate and reprobate from his stand taken before a quasi-judicial authority to....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
