IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ.
Aswathi S, D/O Rajan S., - Petitioner
Versus
Greeshma Pradeep, D/O Pradeep Kumar – Respondent
OP(KAT) NO. 477 OF 2024
Decided On : 18-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under article 227 challenging erratum notification. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural fairness demanded before altering ranked list. (Para 5 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. contentions regarding the tribunal's decision and its legality. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court upheld tribunal's ruling against unfair administrative actions. (Para 17 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The 4th respondent in O.A.(EKM)No.1970 of 2021 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal at Thiruvananthapuram, is before this Court in this original petition filed invoking the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging Ext.P7 order dated 09.10.2024 of the Tribunal in that original application, which was one filed by the 1st respondent herein-applicant, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , to set aside Annexure A11 erratum notification dated 09.11.2021 issued by the 1st respondent Kerala Public Service Commission (2nd respondent herein) and Annexure A12 consequential advice dated 23.11.2021 issued to the 4th respondent (petitioner herein) and Annexure A14 order of appointment dated 13.12.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent State Police Chief (4th respondent herein); an order directing the 1st respondent Kerala Public Service Commission (2nd respondent herein) to advice the applicant (1st respondent herein) as per Annexure A10 ranked list; and to direct the 3rd respondent State Police Chief (4th respondent herein) to effect appointment in accordance with the advice to be made by the Kerala Public Service Commission, on the basis of Annexure A10 ranked list.
2. The pleadings and materials on record would show that the applicant and the 4th respondent in O.A.(EKM)No.1970 of 2021 submitted applications pursuant to Annexure A1 notification dated 10.04.2019 issued by the Kerala Public Service Commission for recruitment to the post of Scientific Assistant (Biology) in the Kerala Police Service (Forensic Science Laboratory), against an NCA vacancy for Scheduled Caste community. The essential qualifications and the preferential qualification prescribed for the said post in Annexure A1 notification, which is in tune with Annexure A13 Special Rules for various technical posts in the Kerala State Forensic Science Laboratory, 2014, read thus;
“a) Essential Qualifications:-
Post Graduate Degree in Botany/Zoology with not less than 50% marks from a recognized University.
b) Preferential Qualification:-
(1) M.Phil Degree in Botany/Zoology from a recognized University.
(2) Two years Research/Analytical experience in Botany/Zoology from a recognized institution.”
3. After conducting an online examination, the Kerala Public Service Commission published Annexure A10 ranked list of the candidates for selection to the post of Scientific Assistant (Biology), in the Kerala Police Service (Forensic Science Laboratory), against NCA vacancy for Scheduled Caste community, in which the 1st respondent-applicant was rank No.1 and the 4th respondent-petitioner herein was rank No.2. Both of them secured 40.67 marks. The said ranked list was brought into force with effect from 24.09.2021. Two months thereafter, the Public Service Commission issued Annexure A11 erratum notification dated 09.11.2021, in which the 4th respondent (petitioner herein) is rank No.1 and the applicant (1st respondent herein) is rank No.2. The said notification reads thus;
“It is hereby notified that the following modifications has been made in the Ranked List No.338/2021/OLE dated 24.09.2021 for selection to the post of Scientific Assistant Biology-1 NCA-SC-Statewide (Cat.No.033/2019)-Kerala Police Service (Forensic Science Laboratory).
The entry “MPhil” in Remarks column, noted against the name of Greeshma Pradeep (Rank No.1) (Reg.No.100107) included in the above Ranked List is deleted from the Ranked List as she possesses only one preferential qualification.
The Rank position of Greeshma Pradeep with Rank No.1

Kerala Public Service Commission v. Dr. Kesavankutty Nair
Shalini Shyam Shetty v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Jai Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The High Court maintains its supervisory role under Article 227, intervening only in cases of manifest errors or injustice by lower tribunals, emphasizing procedural fairness in administrative decisi....
High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 ensures that inferior courts and tribunals act within their authority to prevent injustices.
The High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot replace the tribunal's findings unless there is manifest error or injustice.
The Tribunal violated natural justice by failing to hear both parties before passing its order, necessitating the High Court's intervention under Article 227.
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 cannot alter findings of lower tribunals without clear manifest errors, particularly regarding vacancy reporting tied to expired lists.
Procedural fairness mandates that all affected parties must be notified and heard before any administrative decision is made, in line with natural justice principles.
The supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution is limited to ensuring lower courts act within jurisdiction, without intervening unless there is a manifest error ....
The High Court cannot interfere with the Tribunal's findings under Article 227 unless there is clear evidence of patent perversity or gross failure of justice.
Differently abled candidates are entitled to reservation benefits if a post is identified after the initial notification and within the currency of the selection list, adhering to statutory provision....
The supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 does not permit the High Court to interfere unless there is a manifest error, breach of legal principles, or failure of justice in the tribunal's decisi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.