Back
HARISANKAR V. MENON
Arumughan K. P. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Secretary, Ministry Of Forest And Wild Life – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J.
The petitioners are father and son respectively. This writ petition is filed, challenging Ext.P8 notification issued under Section 5 of the Kerala Preservation of Trees Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trees Act’, for short). The petitioners have also sought for a direction to the respondents not to obstruct them from cutting and removing the trees from the agricultural lands covered by Exts.P1 to P3 title deeds.
2. The petitioners have been holding some properties on the basis of Ext.P1 in the name of the 1st petitioner and Ext.P3 in the name of the 2nd petitioner. These properties were stated to be principally planted with rubber trees as also other trees. A copy of the registration certificate obtained under the provisions of the Rubber Act, 1947, from the Rubber Board is also produced as Ext.P5, to prove that the petitioners were engaged principally in rubber cultivation.
3. Proceedings were taken against the properties of the petitioners under the provisions of the Kerala Private Forest (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Assignment Act’, for short) by the Forest Department. This was taken up by the p
The court established that government notifications under the Trees Act can override previous exemptions, requiring compliance for tree cutting in designated areas.
The main legal point established is that the petitioner's rights under the title deed were modified by the Kerala Grants and Leases (Modification of Rights) Act, 1980, and the petitioner is liable to....
Permission is required for cutting any tree in designated areas; definitions of 'tree' are context-dependent within relevant preservation laws.
Article 48A in part IV of Constitution of India dealing with a duty is cast upon State for 'protection and improvement of environment and safeguarding of forests and wildlife', of country.
Exemption from vesting under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act does not change the classification of land as a private forest, and the Kerala Preservation of Trees Act has overr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that landowners have the right to cut and transport trees from their private land in accordance with the state legislations, especially in the abse....
In quasi-criminal proceedings under Section 10 of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act, strict proof and fair opportunity to contest charges are essential to uphold due process.
Conditions for tree felling permissions can include time limits; a right to cut trees does not extend indefinitely past permission expiry.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
