SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
Sindhu Sivadas, W/o.Sivadas - Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
Crl.MC No.2948 of 2022
Decided on : 07-10-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : P.VIJAYA BHANU (SR.), K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN, P.M.RAFIQ, M.REVIKRISHNAN, AJEESH K.SASI, MITHA SUDHINDRAN, SRUTHY K.K., SRUTHY N.BHAT, RAHUL SUNIL
For the Respondent: SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.RENJIT GEORGE ADDL.R2 BY K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN

IMPORTANT POINT
Disciplinary measures in schools, such as enforcing a uniform dress code, do not constitute cruelty under the Juvenile Justice Act.

Headnote:

Quashment - Juvenile Justice - Section 75 - The court interpreted Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, emphasizing that disciplinary actions by a teacher do not constitute cruelty, thus quashing the proceedings against the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a school principal, was accused of violating Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act for insisting a student wear a uniform, which the prosecution claimed caused unnecessary suffering to the child.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the insistence on wearing a uniform was a disciplinary measure and did not amount to cruelty as defined under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

Issues: Whether the actions of the principal in insisting a student wear a uniform constituted an offence under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that maintaining school discipline through uniform requirements does not equate to causing unnecessary mental or physical suffering to a child.

Result: The proceedings against the petitioner were quashed.

ORDER :

Sole accused in C.C.No.347/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Wadakkanchery, arising out of Crime No.1328/2021 of Wadakkanchery Police Station, Thrissur, who is the petitioner herein, seeks quashment of the proceedings on the submission that the allegation as to commission of offence under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the JJ Act’ hereinafter), is not prima facie made out.

2. Heard the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the statement of the juvenile including relevant records.

3. According to the prosecution, the petitioner herein committed offence punishable under Section 75 of the JJ Act, and the substratum where from the prosecution case emanates is that, the juvenile, who is an 8th Std. student of Bharathiya Vidya Bhavan School, Akamala, Thrissur, reached the school at 10.00 a.m. on 2.3.2020, to know about her result and also to purchase books for 9th Std., in the school bus, by wearing colour dress. According to the juvenile, there was no compulsion to wear colour dress during vacation. When she met the Principal on the corridor of the school, she wished the Principal. Thereafter, the Principal asked the juvenile, why she came in colour dress without wearing uniform and also commented that, since the juvenile is a person, having bulky physique, she should have worn the uniform. Later, she was sent back after getting uniform from the house and wearing the same. This is the way, in which, prosecution alleges commission of the above offence.

4. While pursuing quashment of the entire proceedings, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, the juvenile’s mother and the petitioner herein, are working in the same school as teacher and Principal, respectively. Prior to registration of this crime, the juvenile’s mother was given memo when it was noticed that she was careless in attending the examination duty. Thereafter, this crime was registered without any substance, as a retaliatory shield. The learned senior counsel also submitted that, insisting a student to wear uniform of the school, that too, during the academic period covered by the month of March, would not attract offence under Section 75 of the JJ Act and therefore, the entire prosecution is unwarranted and the same is liable to be quashed.

5. Although the learned Public Prosecutor read out the statement of the juvenile in support of the prosecution case, the one and only allegation is questioning of arrival of the juvenile at the school without wearing colour dress instead of uniform and the insistence made by the Principal to change the dress by substituting uniform.

6. Section 75 of the JJ Act provides as under:

    75. Punishment for cruelty to child.- Whoever, having the actual charge of, or control over, a child, assaults, abandons, abuses, exposes or wilfully neglects the child or causes or procures the child to be assaulted, abandoned, abused, exposed or neglected in a manner likely to cause such child unnecessary mental or physical suffering, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine of one lakh rupees or with both.

Provided that in case it is found that such abandonment of the child by the biological parents is due to circumstances beyond their control, it shall be presumed that such abandonment is not wilful and the penal provisions of this section shall not apply in such cases.

Provided further that if such offence is committed by any person employed by or managing an organization, which is entrusted with the care and protection of the child, he shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment which may extend up to five years, and fine which may extend up to five lakhs rupees.

Provided also that on account of the aforesaid cruelty, if the child is physically incapacitated or develops a mental illness or is rendered mentally unfit to perform regu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top