SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 1180

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, Kauser Edappagath, Mohammed Nias C.P., C.S.Sudha, Syam Kumar V.M.
Dejo Kappan – Appellant
Versus
Deccan Herald – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri.Johnson Manayani, Sri.Benhur Joseph Manayani, Sri.Jeevan Mathew Manayani, Sri.C.J.Joy, Sri.C.C.Abraham, Smt.Tiny Thomas
For the Respondent:Sri.K.Gopalakrishna Kurup, Advocate General, Shri.V.Manu, Senior G.P.(Gp-46), Sri.Ashik K.Mohammed Ali, Sri.Suvin R Menon, Cgc, Smt.R.Ranjanie, Sri.P.Aniyan, Sri.G.Biju, Sri.Benoj C Augustin, Sri.V.B.Hari Narayanan, Sri.Jomy George, Sri.S.Jiji, Sri.Kaleeswaram Raj, Smt.J.Kasthuri, Sri.Jaffer Khan Y., Senior Govt. Pleader, Smt.Asha Babu, Sri.K.Ramakumar (Sr.), Sri.Krishnadas P. Nair, Sri.M.R.Rajendran Nair (Sr.), Sri.Sebastian Paul, Sri. M.R. Sudheendran, Sri.C.M.Andrews, Sri.Elvin Peter P.J. (Sr.), Sri.Grashious Kuriakose (Sr.), Sri.N.N.Sugunapalan (Sr.) (Amicus Curiae), Smt.Boby M.Sekhar, Sri.V.J.James, Sri.Jaimon Andrews, Sri.Millu Dandapani, Sri.V.V.Nandagopal Nambiar, Sri.A.H.Najmal, Sri.Peeyus A.Kottam, Dr.K.P.Pradeep, Sri.T.T.Rakesh, Sri.Ruben George Rock, Sri.G.Shrikumar (Sr.), Sri.Shyam Padman (Sr.), Smt.Sreekala Krishnadas, Smt.A.Salini Lal, Sri.R.Sunil Kumar, Sri.Rajit, Sc, Bar Council Of India, Smt.T.Thasmi, Sri.S.Vaisakh, Sri.Vimal Sankar

JUDGMENT :

A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

These writ petitions raise an interesting question as regards the scope, content and extent of the right to freedom of speech and expression enuring to the media when they report facts about ongoing criminal investigations or the proceedings in cases pending adjudication before the various adjudicatory forums in the country. The writ petitions were initially considered by a Full Bench of this Court. However, by an order dated 24.05.2018, the Full Bench took the view that in the light of an earlier decision of another Full Bench of this Court in S. Sudin v. Union of India and Others – [2015 (2) KLT 296 (FB)], these matters needed to be referred to a Larger Bench of five Judges for consideration. It is thus, and pursuant to an order dated 02.09.2024 of the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice, that these matters are now before us.

The issue to be considered:

Taking note of the specific prayers sought for in the writ petitions, in the light of the law as it then stood, the Full Bench of this Court that was considering the matter earlier had, on 21.02.2017, framed the following six issues for its consideration;

    1. Whether the existing regulations are suff

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                    whatsapp-icon Back to top