IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Muhammed Kutty S/O Abubacker Haji – Appellant
Versus
Sub Registrar, Thrithala – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
1. The property having an extent of 72.87 Ares comprised in Survey No. 379/4-9 of Thrithala Village, Pattambi Taluk, Palakkad District, originally belonged to late Abubacker Haji. The petitioner is one of the legal heirs of Abubacker Haji. After the death of Abubacker Haji, the petitioner and his remaining children decided to settle the property in favour of their mother and accordingly, prepared Ext.P1 draft settlement deed and submitted the same for registration before the respondent No. 1. According to the petitioner, the respondent No. 1 refused to register Ext.P1 settlement deed, insisting on prior title deed of the property. It is in these circumstances, the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. I have heard Sri. T.H. Shain, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. B.S. Syamanthak, the learned Government Pleader.
3. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the Sub-Registrar did not register Ext.P1 settlement deed since the petitioner failed to produce title deed of the property to show that his father acquired title over the property.
4. Section 34 of the Registration Act, 1908 provides for enquiry before regis
The Registering Officer cannot refuse to register a document based solely on the absence of a prior title deed, as per the Registration Act and Rules.
The Registering Officer cannot refuse to register a document based solely on the non-production of a prior title deed, as per the Registration Rules (Kerala) provisions.
The Registering Officer cannot refuse registration of a document for lack of prior title deeds under the Kerala Registration Rules.
Possessory rights can be transferred without the need for prior documents under Section 17 of the Registration Act.
A registering authority cannot refuse to register a deed based on the non-production of prior title documents; title determination is beyond its jurisdiction.
The Sub Registrar cannot refuse registration of a document solely due to title disputes unless it is proven the vendor has no title over the property in question.
The Sub Registrar must register a sale deed if procedural requirements are met, regardless of title disputes, as they lack adjudicative authority regarding ownership.
Non-production of original documents cannot justify refusal to register a settlement deed when certified copies are available, affirming the constitutional right to property.
The Registering Officer must verify original documents for property registration to prevent fraud, and parties claiming rights must establish their claims before a competent court.
The Sub-registrar has no authority to refuse registration of a deed based on allegations of forgery, as disputes of title are exclusively within civil courts' jurisdiction.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.