SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Ori) 786

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.C. BEHERA
Rajani Kanta Palo – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.K. Behea-1
For the Respondent: J. Sahoo

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for registration refusal quashed. (Para 1)
2. authority of sub-registrar in deed registration questioned. (Para 3)
3. legal precedents limit refusal of registration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. writ petition allowed; registration ordered. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the order of refusal of registration of the deed for sale of the petitioner passed on dated 05.12.2024 (Annexure-5 series) by the Sub-registrar, Berhampur-II, Ganjam (Opposite Party No.4) on the basis of the Letter No.11928 dated 14.10.2024 issued by the Tahasildar, Kukudakhandi, Ganjam indicating that, the deed for sale submitted by the petitioner before the Opposite Party No.4 for registration is a forged one and notice has been issued by him (Tahasildar, Kukudakhandi) to the petitioner for his appearance before him (Tahasildar, Kukudakhandi), but, he (petitioner) has not submitted any written statement as yet.

3. As per the rival submissions of the learned counsels of both the parties basing upon the impugned order vide Annexure-5 series pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top